SEC Filing | Green Dot Corporation

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Download XBRL

gdot-20230414

Table of Contents

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )


Filed by the Registrant		þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant		o
Check the appropriate box:
o	Preliminary Proxy Statement
o	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ	Definitive Proxy Statement
o	Definitive Additional Materials
o	Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12


Green Dot Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

N/A
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ			No fee required.
o			Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o			Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

Table of Contents

https://cdn.kscope.io/0876c7533adb8fb51cb657e2ce1584bf-gdotimage01.jpg

April 14, 2023

Dear Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Green Dot Corporation. Our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held as a "virtual meeting" of stockholders and stockholders will not be able to attend the meeting in-person. Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be conducted exclusively via the internet at a virtual audio web conference at https://meetnow.global/MUWUCMM on May 25, 2023, at 12:30 p.m. Central Time.

You can attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders online, vote your shares during the online meeting and submit questions during the online meeting by visiting the above-mentioned internet site. We are committed to ensuring, to the extent possible, that stockholders will be afforded the ability to participate at the virtual meeting like they would at an in-person meeting. Details regarding how to access the virtual meeting via the internet and the business to be conducted at the meeting are more fully described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement.

We have elected to deliver our proxy materials to our stockholders over the internet and will mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement for our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2022 annual report to stockholders. This notice also provides instructions on how to vote by telephone or through the internet and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

The matters to be acted upon are described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement.

We hope that you will be able to attend this year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please vote through the internet or by telephone or request, sign and return a proxy card to ensure your representation at the meeting. Your vote is important.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, we would like to express our appreciation for your continued support of Green Dot Corporation.

Sincerely,



George Gresham			William I Jacobs
President and Chief Executive Officer			Chairperson of the Board

Table of Contents

GREEN DOT CORPORATION

________________

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held May 25, 2023

________________

To Our Stockholders:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Green Dot Corporation will be held on May 25, 2023 at 12:30 p.m. Central Time exclusively via the internet at a virtual audio web conference.

To facilitate greater stockholder access, we have determined that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held exclusively online in a virtual meeting format only, via the internet, with no physical in-person meeting. At our virtual meeting, stockholders will be able to attend, vote and submit questions by visiting https://meetnow.global/MUWUCMM. Further information about how to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders online, vote your shares online during the meeting and submit questions during the meeting is included in the accompanying proxy statement.

We are holding the meeting for the following purposes, which are more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

1.To elect the 9 nominees named in the proxy statement to the Board of Directors;

2.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2023;

3.To vote on a non-binding advisory resolution to approve executive compensation;

4.To conduct a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation; and

5.To approve the amendment and restatement of Green Dot’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.

In addition, stockholders may be asked to consider and vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 3, 2023 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting and any adjournments thereof.

Your vote as a Green Dot Corporation stockholder is very important. Each share of Class A common stock that you own represents one vote. For questions regarding your stock ownership, you may contact Investor Relations at (626) 765-2427 or, if you are a registered holder, our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., by email through their website at www.computershare.com/contactus or by phone toll free at (800) 962-4284.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Amy Pugh

General Counsel and Secretary

Austin, Texas

April 14, 2023

Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, we encourage you to read the proxy statement and vote by telephone or through the internet or submit your proxy card or voting instructions as soon as possible, so that your shares may be represented at the meeting. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the section entitled "Questions and Answers About the Meeting" beginning on page 9 of the proxy statement and the instructions on the enclosed Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

Table of Contents

GREEN DOT CORPORATION

PROXY STATEMENT FOR 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PROXY SUMMARY			1
GENERAL PROXY INFORMATION			9
Information About Solicitation and Voting			9
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials			9
Questions and Answers About the Meeting			9
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE			14
Corporate Governance Guidelines			14
Board Leadership Structure			14
Our Board of Directors' Role in Risk Oversight			14
Independence of Directors			15
Committees of Our Board of Directors			16
Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance			17
Board Attendance at Annual Stockholders' Meeting			17
Presiding Director of Non-Employee Director Meetings			17
Communication with Directors			20
Proxy Access			20
Stockholder Engagement			20
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics			21
Information Security and Privacy Risk Oversight			21
Environmental, Social and Governance Matters			23
NOMINATIONS PROCESS AND DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS			25
Nomination to the Board of Directors			25
Director Qualifications			25
PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS			26
Nominees to the Board of Directors			26
Director Biographies			27
Director Compensation			31
PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM			34
Principal Accountant Fees and Services			34
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			34
PROPOSAL NO. 3 ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			35
PROPOSAL NO. 4 ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF AN ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			36
PROPOSAL NO. 5 APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT OF THE 2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN			37
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT			45
OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS			47

Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			48
A Message from the Chair of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors			48
Compensation Discussion and Analysis			50
Compensation Committee Report			65
Executive Compensation Tables			66
Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control			70
CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure			73
Calculation Methodology			73
Pay Versus Performance			74
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES, FOUNDERS AND CONTROL PERSONS			78
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Parties			78
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE			79
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION			80
Stockholder Proposals to be Presented at Next Annual Meeting			80
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports			80
Available Information			80
“Householding” - Stockholders Sharing the Same Last Name and Address			81
OTHER MATTERS			81
NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS			81
INFORMATION REFERENCED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT			81
APPENDIX A - NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES			82
APPENDIX B - 2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED			86

Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all information you should consider. Please read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

Annual

Stockholders

Meeting

Record date

April 3, 2023

Date of Mailing/Availability

The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is being mailed, and the proxy statement is being made available, to our stockholders on or about April 14, 2023.

Meeting agenda

The meeting will cover the proposals listed under "Voting matters and vote recommendations" below, and any other business that may properly come before the meeting.

Date May 25, 2023

Time 12:30 p.m. Central Time

Place Exclusively via the internet at a virtual audio web conference at https://meetnow.global/MUWUCMM.

Voting

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of our Class A common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals.

Table of Contents

Voting matters and vote recommendations

See the actual proposals for more information.

Management

Proposals

Board
recommends

Reasons for
Recommendation

See
page

Election of 9 directors

FOR

Our Board of Directors (“Board”) and its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe the 9 Board nominees possess the skills, and experience to effectively monitor performance, provide oversight, and advise management on our long-term strategy.

Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for fiscal year 2023

FOR

Based on the Audit Committee’s assessment of Ernst & Young LLP’s qualifications and performance, it believes their retention for fiscal year 2023 is in the best interests of our company.

Advisory vote to approve executive compensation

FOR

Our executive compensation programs demonstrate our execution on our pay for performance philosophy and reflect corporate governance best practices.

Advisory vote on the frequency of future votes on executive compensation

1 YEAR

Our Board believes that advisory “say-on-pay” votes should be conducted every year so that our stockholders may provide us with their regular and direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices.

Approval of the amendment and restatement of our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan

FOR

Our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan addresses the continuing need to provide performance-based restricted stock units, restricted stock units and other equity-based incentives to attract and retain the most qualified personnel and to respond to relevant market changes in equity compensation practices.

Table of Contents

Corporate governance facts


Independent Board and Board committees

	•	Chairperson and CEO positions are separate
	•	Independent Chairperson of the Board
	•	8 of 9 director nominees are independent
	•	100% of committee members are independent
	•	Independent directors meet in executive session regularly

	•	We conduct annual board and committee evaluations
	•	All Audit Committee members are financially literate, and 2 of our Audit Committee members are Audit Committee Financial Experts
	•	Our Compensation Committee uses an independent compensation consultant


Best practices stockholder rights

	•	Directors are elected by a majority vote of stockholders in uncontested elections
	•	All directors are elected annually
	•	Our bylaws provide for proxy access by stockholders
	•	No poison-pill
	•	No multi-class or non-voting stock


Strong information security oversight

	•	Board and Risk Committee oversight
	•	Robust information security program and annual independent on-site security audits

Table of Contents

2022 business highlights


Solid financial results

	•	Strong bottom line growth drove solid financial results with a continued focus on improving operational efficiency
	•	2022 GAAP Revenue Up 1%; Non-GAAP Revenue1 Up 3%
	•	2022 Net Income Up 35%; Adjusted EBITDA1 Up 10%
	•	2022 Operating Expenses down 0.8%
	•	2022 GAAP EPS Up 40%; Non-GAAP EPS1 Up 17%


New Management Structure to Optimize Performance

	•	New structure focuses on operational excellence and revenue growth
	•	George Gresham appointed President and Chief Executive Officer
	•	Jess Unruh appointed Chief Financial Officer
	•	Teresa Watkins appointed Chief Operations Officer
	•	Chris Ruppel appointed Chief Revenue Officer
	•	Amy Pugh appointed General Counsel


Continuing to Drive Operational Efficiency

	•	Working to build a modern and scalable core banking and card management platform that reduces our reliance on third-party processors and increases our ability to innovate and preserve margins
	•	We completed our first platform conversion in the fourth quarter and the remaining platform conversions are expected to be completed in 2023
	•	Drove substantial improvement in key areas like risk and customer care


Improving Momentum in Key Areas and New Business Wins

	•	Signed a major Banking as a Service ("BaaS") partner scheduled to be launched in 2023
	•	GO2bank saw strong momentum with revenue up 80% for the year and is now ~45% of the direct channel and ~15% of Consumer Services

1 Please see Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures.

Table of Contents

Our director nominees

See “Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors” for more information.

The following table provides summary information about each director nominee. Each director is elected annually by a majority of votes cast.

Name and
Occupation

Age

Director Since

Independent

Other Public Boards

Committee Memberships

NGC

Director Nominees

J. Chris Brewster

Former CFO, Cardtronics, Inc.

2016

Yes

—

Rajeev V. Date

Managing Partner, Fenway Summer LLC

2016

Yes

Saturnino “Nino” Fanlo

Former CFO and COO, Human Longevity, Inc.

2016

Yes

—

Peter Feld

Managing Member and Head of Research, Starboard Value LP

2022

Yes

George Gresham

President and CEO

2021

—

William I Jacobs*

Board Member, Repay Holdings Corporation

2016

Yes

Jeffrey B. Osher

Founder, No Street Capital

2020

Yes

Ellen Richey

Former Vice Chairman and Chief Risk Officer, Visa Inc.

2020

Yes

George T. Shaheen

Managing Member, Andersen

2013

Yes

_____________

AC: Audit Committee

CC: Compensation Committee

NGC: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

RC: Risk Committee

Chairperson of the Board

Chair

Member

Financial Expert

Table of Contents

Board Nominee Tenure


0 - 5 Years:	6 - 8 Years:	8+ Years:	Average tenure of all director nominees: 4.2 years
44%	44%	11%

Board Nominee Profile

Board Refreshment

Table of Contents


Executive compensation highlights See “Proposal No. 3 - Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation” and “Executive Compensation” for more information.

Significant Portion of Target Total Direct Compensation is at Risk/Performance-based The following charts provide a breakdown of the annual target total direct compensation of our current CEO and our other NEOs in 2022, who participated in our annual executive compensation program for 2022. 1 2						Key Fiscal 2022 Compensation Decisions •No long-term incentive grants in 2022. Consistent with our prior commitments, we did not grant any annual equity awards in 2022. •New compensation packages approved in connection with promotions. Mr. Gresham, Mr. Unruh and Ms. Watkins received an increase in their salary and target bonus and Mr. Gresham received an additional equity award grant in connection with their respective promotions. •2022 short-term incentives paid out below target. We achieved 78% of our target EBITDA goal and the cash incentive awards of certain executive officers (including our Chief Executive Officer) were further reduced based on them not achieving 100% of their management business objectives. •2021 long-term incentives grants were earned at slightly above target. In 2021, we granted PRSUs to our executive officers with a 2022 non-GAAP EPS goal, which applied to 50% of the PRSUs that were granted. •While the Company achieved a non-GAAP EPS of $2.59 for 2022, which would have resulted in 118% of the applicable target PRSUs being earned, the Committee elected to reduce the number of target PRSUs earned to 112% after considering the impact of stock repurchases and the Company’s overall performance. Our Response to our 2022 Say on Pay Vote (related to 2021 compensation) and Commitment to Governance In response to the 2022 say-on-pay vote, in which 99% of votes cast (for or against), voted in favor of our compensation program, we followed through with our commitments to our stockholders realign our compensation with best practices, and have made the following enhancements to our compensation program: •We revised our 2022 short-term incentive plan to allow for the ability to reduce (but not increase) payouts based on individual achievement against key strategic objectives, subject to the achievement of corporate financial objectives, thereby creating greater individual accountability. •We revised our long-term equity incentive program to include a 3-year performance period and to incorporate 3-year earnings per share goals and 3-year relative total stockholder return, or TSR, modifier goals, beginning with our 2023 PRSU grants. Also consistent with our prior commitments, we did not make one-time equity award grants or pay discretionary bonuses to our executive officers outside of our normal executive compensation incentive programs, except in the context of new hires and promotions, and did not grant any annual equity awards in 2022.


1 Reflects 2022 salary rates, 2022 target incentive amounts and 50% of the target value of 2021 PRSUs and RSUs that were intended to cover both 2021 and 2022, and not amounts actually earned or paid out. Excludes promotional RSU award granted to Mr. Gresham on October 17, 2022. Amounts do not sum to 100% due to rounding. 2 Excludes Mr. Ruppel and Ms. Watkins, who joined us as executive officers in November 2022. Also excludes Mr. Henry, who terminated his employment with us in October 2022.

Table of Contents


Sound program design

	We design our executive officer compensation programs to attract, motivate, and retain the key executives who drive our success and industry leadership while considering individual and company performance and alignment with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We achieve our objectives through compensation that:
		Provides a competitive target total direct pay opportunity
		Consists primarily of performance-based and/or at-risk compensation
		Provides annual short-term and long-term incentive opportunities that are 100% performance-based and/or at risk
		Enhances retention through multi-year vesting of stock awards
		Does not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk taking


Best practices in executive compensation

	Our leading practices include:
		A claw-back policy
		An executive stock ownership policy
		A policy prohibiting pledging and hedging ownership of Green Dot stock
		Seeking feedback on executive compensation through stockholder engagement
		No discretionary bonuses or guaranteed payout levels
		No tax gross-ups and perquisites
		No single trigger change in control benefits
		No executive-only retirement programs
		No excessive cash severance

Table of Contents

GREEN DOT CORPORATION

________________

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2023

________________

April 14, 2023

Information About Solicitation and Voting

The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Green Dot Corporation for use at Green Dot’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "2023 Annual Meeting" "Annual Meeting" or “meeting”) to be held exclusively via the internet at a virtual audio web conference at https://meetnow.global/MUWUCMM on May 25, 2023, at 12:30 p.m. Central Time, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. References in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting, or the Proxy Statement, to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “company” or “Green Dot” refer to Green Dot Corporation.

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

Under rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders primarily via the internet, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each stockholder. On or about April 14, 2023, we expect to send our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice of Internet Availability”) containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including our proxy statement and our annual report. The Notice of Internet Availability also provides instructions on how to vote by telephone or through the internet and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. If you prefer to receive printed proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability.

Questions and Answers About the Meeting

Why is the 2023 Annual Meeting being held as a virtual, online meeting?

To facilitate greater stockholder attendance, the meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders where stockholders will participate by accessing a website using the internet. There will not be a physical meeting location. We believe that hosting a virtual meeting will facilitate stockholder attendance and participation at the 2023 Annual Meeting by enabling stockholders to participate remotely from any location around the world. We have designed the virtual 2023 Annual Meeting to provide the same rights and opportunities to participate as stockholders would have at an in-person meeting, including the right to vote and ask questions through the virtual meeting platform.

Who can vote their shares and attend the 2023 Annual Meeting?

Stockholders as of the record date for the meeting, April 3, 2023, are entitled to vote their shares and attend the meeting. At the close of business on the record date, there were 51,994,067 shares of Green Dot Class A common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If on April 3, 2023, your shares were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (“Computershare”), then you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As a stockholder of record, you may vote at the meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote by telephone or through the internet, or if you request or receive paper proxy materials by mail, by filling out and returning a proxy card.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Other Nominee

If on April 3, 2023, your shares were held in an account with a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, then you are the beneficial owner of the shares held in street name. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your nominee on how to vote the shares held in your account, and your nominee has enclosed or provided voting instructions for you to use in directing it on how to vote your shares. However, the organization that holds your shares is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the meeting. Because you are not the stockholder of record, you may not attend or vote your shares at the meeting unless you (i) request and obtain a legal proxy giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting from the organization that holds your shares and

Table of Contents

(ii) register to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting. Please see “How do I register to attend the virtual 2023 Annual Meeting?” below for information on how to register to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting.

How do I virtually attend the 2023 Annual Meeting?

We will host the 2023 Annual Meeting live online via audio webcast. You may attend the 2023 Annual Meeting live online by visiting https://meetnow.global/MUWUCMM. The webcast will start at 12:30 p.m. Central Time on May 25, 2023. If you are a stockholder of record, you will need to enter the control number included on your proxy card in order to be able to enter the 2023 Annual Meeting online. If you are a beneficial owner and have registered in advance to participate in the 2023 Annual Meeting, you will need to enter the control number that you received from Computershare. Online check-in will begin at 12:00 p.m. Central Time on May 25, 2023, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in proceedings. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting, please see the instructions on the virtual meeting website for technical support.

How do I register to attend the virtual 2023 Annual Meeting?

If you are a stockholder of record, you do not need to register to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting. However, if you are the beneficial owner of your shares, you must register in advance to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting. To register to attend the virtual 2023 Annual Meeting online, you must obtain a legal proxy from your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee and submit proof of your legal proxy reflecting your holdings of our stock, along with your legal name and email address, to our virtual meeting provider, Computershare. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 22, 2023. You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email and a control number after we receive your registration materials. Requests for registration should be directed to the following:

By email: Forward the email from your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, or attach an image of your legal proxy, to legalproxy@computershare.com.

By mail: Mail to Computershare, Green Dot Legal Proxy, P.O. Box 43001 Providence, RI 02940-3001.

What if I have trouble accessing the Annual Meeting virtually?

The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (MS Edge, Firefox, Chrome and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets and cell phones) running the most up-to-date version of applicable software and plugins. Note: Internet Explorer is not a supported browser. Participants should ensure that they have a strong WiFi connection wherever they intend to participate in the meeting. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. For further assistance should you need it you may call 1-888-724-2416.

What is the purpose of the meeting?

At the meeting, stockholders will act upon the proposals described in this proxy statement. In addition, following the meeting, management will be available to respond to questions from stockholders.

What proposals are scheduled to be voted on at the meeting?

Stockholders will be asked to vote on five proposals. The proposals are:

1.To elect the 9 nominees named in this proxy statement to the Board;

2.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2023;

3.To vote on a non-binding advisory resolution to approve executive compensation;

4.To conduct a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation; and

5.To approve the amendment and restatement of Green Dot's 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.

Could matters other than Proposal Nos. 1-5 be decided at the meeting?

Our bylaws require that we receive advance notice of any proposal to be brought before the meeting by stockholders of Green Dot, and we have not received notice of any such proposals. If any other matter were to come before the meeting, the proxy holders appointed by the Board will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

Table of Contents

What is the recommendation of the Board of Directors on each of the proposals scheduled to be voted on at the meeting?

The Board recommends that you vote FOR each of the nominees named in this proxy statement (Proposal No. 1), FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2023 (Proposal No. 2), FOR the non-binding advisory resolution to approve executive compensation (Proposal No. 3), FOR "1 Year" on the non-binding advisory vote for the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation (Proposal No. 4) and FOR the amendment and restatement of our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (Proposal No. 5).

How do I vote?

You may vote by internet, by mail or follow any alternative voting procedure (such as telephone or internet voting) described on your proxy card or your voting instruction card. To use an alternative voting procedure, follow the instructions on each proxy card or your voting instruction card that you receive. The procedures for voting are as follows:

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote before the 2023 Annual Meeting:

•by telephone or through the internet - in order to do so, please follow the instructions shown on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card; or

•by mail - if you request or receive a paper proxy card and voting instructions by mail, simply complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it before the meeting in the pre-paid envelope provided.

You may also vote during the 2023 Annual Meeting through the internet.

Votes submitted by telephone before the meeting must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, on May 24, 2023. If you want to vote through the internet, your votes can be submitted before and during the 2023 Annual Meeting. If you vote by mail, your proxy card must be received by May 24, 2023. Submitting your proxy before the meeting, whether by telephone, through the internet or by mail if you request or received a paper proxy card, will not affect your right to vote at the meeting should you decide to attend and participate in the 2023 Annual Meeting virtually online at https://meetnow.global/MUWUCMM and vote your shares electronically before the polls close during the meeting.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Other Nominee

If you are not the stockholder of record, please refer to the voting instructions provided by your nominee regarding how to vote your shares. Your vote is important. To ensure that your vote is counted, complete and mail the voting instruction card provided by your brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee as directed by your nominee. To vote at the 2023 Annual Meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from your nominee and register to attend the meeting. Please see “How do I register to attend the virtual 2023 Annual Meeting?” above for information on how to register to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote your voting instruction card to ensure that your vote is counted.

How do I vote by internet or telephone before the meeting?

If you wish to vote by internet or telephone, you may do so by following the voting instructions included on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card. Please have each Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card you received in hand when you vote over the internet or by telephone as you will need information specified in those documents to submit your vote. The giving of such a telephonic or internet proxy will not affect your right to vote virtually (as detailed above) should you decide to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting virtually.

The telephone and internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly.

What shares can I vote?

Each share of Green Dot Class A common stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on April 3, 2023 is entitled to vote on all items being voted on at the meeting. You may vote all shares owned by you as of April 3, 2023, including (1) shares held directly in your name as the stockholder of record, and (2) shares held for you as the beneficial owner in street name through a broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee.

Table of Contents

How many votes am I entitled to per share?

Each holder of shares of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Class A common stock held as of April 3, 2023.

What is the quorum requirement for the meeting?

The holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of stock entitled to vote at the meeting as of the record date must be present virtually at the meeting or represented by proxy at the meeting in order to hold the meeting and conduct business. This presence is called a quorum. Your shares are counted as present at the meeting if you are present virtually and vote at the meeting or if you have properly submitted a proxy. Shares present virtually during the 2023 Annual Meeting will be considered shares of Class A common stock represented in person at the meeting.

How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated and which proposals are considered “routine” or “non-routine”?

Abstentions (shares present at the meeting and voted “abstain”) are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present and have no effect on the outcome of the matters voted upon.

A broker non-vote occurs when the beneficial owner of shares fails to provide the broker, bank or other nominee that holds the shares with specific instructions on how to vote on any “non-routine” matters brought to a vote at the stockholders meeting. In this situation, the broker, bank or other nominee will not vote on the “non-routine” matter. Broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present and have no effect on the outcome of the matters voted upon.

Note that if you are a beneficial holder, brokers and other nominees will be entitled to vote your shares on “routine” matters without instructions from you. The only proposal that would be considered “routine” in such event is the proposal for the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2023 (Proposal No. 2). A broker or other nominee will not be entitled to vote your shares on any “non-routine” matters, absent instructions from you. “Non-routine” matters include all proposals other than Proposal No. 2, including the election of directors. Accordingly, we encourage you to provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.

What is the vote required for each proposal?

The votes required to approve each proposal are as follows:

•Proposal No. 1. Each director nominee must be elected by a majority of the votes cast, meaning that the number of shares entitled to vote on the election of directors and represented virtually at the meeting or by proxy at the meeting casting their votes “FOR” a director must exceed the number of votes “AGAINST” a director.

•Proposal Nos. 2, 3 and 5. Approval of each of Proposal Nos. 2, 3 and 5 will be obtained if a majority of the votes cast are “FOR” the proposal.

•Proposal No. 4. The outcome of Proposal No. 4 will be decided by a plurality of the votes cast, which means that option receiving the highest number of votes will be approved. With respect to Proposal No. 4, you may vote for "1 Year", "2 Years" or "3 Years", or "Abstain" from voting.

What if I return a proxy card but do not make specific choices?

If you return a validly executed proxy card but do not indicate your voting preferences, your shares will be voted in the manner recommended by the Board on all matters presented in this proxy statement for which no instruction was provided and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting.

If you hold your shares in street name and do not indicate to your broker or other nominee your voting preferences, and your broker does not have discretionary power to vote your shares, your shares may constitute “broker non-votes” (as described above) and will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for approval of the proposals. However, shares that constitute broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of establishing a quorum for the meeting. Voting results will be tabulated and certified by the inspector of elections appointed for the meeting.

Table of Contents

Who is soliciting my proxy and paying for this proxy solicitation?

The expenses of soliciting proxies will be paid by Green Dot. Following the original mailing of the soliciting materials, Green Dot and its agents may solicit proxies by mail, electronic mail, telephone, facsimile or by other similar means. Our directors, officers and other employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies personally or in writing, by telephone, email, or otherwise. Following the original mailing of the soliciting materials, Green Dot will request brokers, custodians, nominees and other record holders to forward copies of the soliciting materials to persons for whom they hold shares and to request authority for the exercise of proxies. In such cases, Green Dot, upon the request of the record holders, will reimburse such holders for their reasonable expenses. If you choose to access the proxy materials and/or vote through the internet, you are responsible for any internet access charges you may incur.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability?

If you receive more than one proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability, your shares are registered in more than one name or are registered in different accounts. For example, you may own some shares directly as a stockholder of record and other shares through a brokerage firm, or you may own shares through more than one brokerage firm. In these situations, you may receive multiple sets of proxy materials. To make certain all of your shares are voted, please follow the instructions included on the Notice of Internet Availability on how to access each proxy card and vote each proxy card by telephone or through the internet. If you requested or received paper proxy materials by mail, please complete, sign and return each proxy card to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

How can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?

A stockholder who has given a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised at the meeting by:

•delivering to the Corporate Secretary of Green Dot a written notice stating that the proxy is revoked;

•signing and delivering a proxy bearing a later date;

•voting again by telephone or through the internet; or

•attending and voting at the meeting (although attendance at the meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy).

Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to revoke a proxy, you must contact that firm to revoke any prior voting instructions.

Only the latest-dated validly executed proxy that you submit will be counted.

How can I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

The Notice of Internet Availability will provide you with instructions regarding how to:

•view our proxy materials for the meeting through the internet; and

•instruct us to send our future proxy materials to you electronically by email.

If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Will you make a list of the stockholders of record entitled to vote at the 2023 Annual Meeting available through electronic means?

We will make available an electronic list of stockholders of record as of the record date for inspection by stockholders from May 15, 2023 through May 24, 2023. To access the electronic list during this time, please send your request, along with proof of ownership, by email to IR@greendot.com. You will receive confirmation of your request and instructions on how to view the electronic list. The list will also be available to stockholders at https://meetnow.global/MUWUCMM during the live audio webcast of the 2023 Annual Meeting.

Where can I find the voting results?

The results will be tallied by the inspector of elections and filed with the SEC in a current report on Form 8-K within four business days of the meeting.

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Green Dot is strongly committed to good corporate governance practices. These practices provide an important framework within which our Board and management can pursue our strategic objectives for the benefit of our stockholders.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that set forth expectations for directors, director independence standards, board committee structure and functions and other policies for the governance of our company. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Investor Relations section of our website, which is located at http://ir.greendot.com, by clicking on “Corporate Governance Guidelines,” under “Governance.” Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the Corporate Governance Guidelines at least annually and recommends changes to our Board, as warranted.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board retains the flexibility to determine on a case-by-case basis whether the Chief Executive Officer or an independent director should serve as Chairperson of the Board. This flexibility permits our Board to organize its functions and conduct its business in a manner it deems most effective under then-prevailing circumstances.

During those periods in which the positions of Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer are combined, the independent directors appoint an independent director as a Lead Independent Director, and we separate the responsibilities of the Chairperson and the Lead Independent Director as follows:


Lead Independent Director						Chairperson
•Presides over executive sessions of independent directors						•Schedules and sets the agenda for meetings of the Board
•Serves as a liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors						•Chairs meetings of the full Board
•Available, for consultation and direct communication with stockholders and performs such other functions and responsibilities as requested by the Board from time to time						•Contributes to Board governance and Board processes
•Encourage direct dialogue between all directors (particularly those with dissenting views) and management						•Communicates with all Directors on key issues and concerns outside of Board meetings
						•Presides over meetings of stockholders

Currently, the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson of the Board are separate. William I Jacobs, one of our independent directors, has served as non-executive Chairperson of the Board since June 2016 (other than during the period from January 2020 to the end of March 2020 when he served as interim Chief Executive Officer while also serving as Chairperson of the Board, and George T. Shaheen served as Lead Independent Director). The Board believes that having an independent director serve as the non-executive Chairperson of the Board is the appropriate leadership structure for our company at this time because it allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on executing our company’s strategic plan and managing our company’s operations and performance, while allowing the Chairperson of the Board to focus on the effectiveness of the Board and independent oversight of our senior management team.

Our Board of Directors' Role in Risk Oversight

Management continually monitors the material risks we face, including financial risk, strategic risk, enterprise and operational risk and legal and compliance risk. The Board is responsible for exercising oversight of management’s identification and management of, and planning for, those risks. In fulfilling this oversight role, our Board focuses on understanding the nature of our enterprise risks, including our operations and strategic direction, as well as the adequacy of our risk management process and overall risk management system. While the full Board has overall responsibility for risk oversight, the Board has delegated oversight responsibility related to certain risks to the Risk Committee and to other committees of our Board, including responsibility for oversight and review of risk areas for our company and its subsidiary bank.

Table of Contents


The Board
Our Board, as a whole, has responsibility for risk oversight, and through its committees oversees and reviews risk areas for our company and its subsidiary bank. At its regularly scheduled meetings, the Board receives management updates and Committee reports regarding business operations, financial results, Committee activities, strategy, and discusses risks related to the business.

The Board and its committees' areas of focus when conducting risk assessments include, but are not limited to, strategic, economic, operational (including cybersecurity), financial (accounting, credit, liquidity and tax), legal, regulatory, compliance and reputational risks.


Risk Committee						Audit Committee
The Risk Committee oversees enterprise risks for Green Dot and its subsidiary bank. The Risk Committee also reviews strategic, financial, information security (including cyber defense management), compliance and other execution risks and exposures, as well as regulatory exposures and other current matters that may present material risk to our company. Additionally, the Risk Committee oversees our Corporate Risk function. The Risk Committee receives periodic reports from our Chief Risk Officer and Chief Compliance Officer on our enterprise risk management program.						Our Audit Committee meets in executive session with key management personnel and representatives of outside advisors to oversee risks associated with their respective principal areas of focus. The Audit Committee discusses with management and our independent registered public accounting firm our guidelines and policies to govern the process by which management assesses and manages our company’s exposure to risk. The Audit Committee also discusses our major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to limit, monitor and control such exposures. Additionally, the Audit Committee oversees our internal audit function.


Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee						Compensation Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews risks and exposures relating to corporate governance, ESG and related legal compliance risks and monitors the steps management has taken to mitigate these exposures.						The Compensation Committee reviews risks and exposures associated with leadership assessment and executive compensation programs and arrangements, including incentive plans.


The Role of Management
The risk oversight responsibility of our Board and its committees is supported by our management reporting processes, which are designed to provide our Board with information regarding the identification, assessment and management of critical risks and management’s risk mitigation strategies.

Independence of Directors

Our Board determines the independence of our directors by applying the independence principles and standards established by the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE. These provide that a director is independent only if the board affirmatively determines that the director has no direct or indirect material relationship with our company. They also specify various relationships that preclude a determination of director independence. Material relationships may include commercial, industrial, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, family and other business, professional and personal relationships.

Applying these standards, the board annually reviews the independence of our directors, taking into account all relevant facts and circumstances. In its most recent review, the board considered, among other things, the absence of any current employment relationships between the company and our directors or their families (except in the case of George Gresham, our current President and Chief Executive Officer); the absence of any of the other specific relationships that would preclude a determination of independence under the rules of the NYSE; the absence of transactions with non-employee directors and members of their families that would require disclosure in this proxy statement under SEC rules regarding related person transactions; and the absence of any other material relationships between the non-employee directors and Green Dot.

Table of Contents

Based upon this review, our Board has determined that the following persons who served as directors in 2022 and current directors were or are independent as determined under the rules of the NYSE:

•J. Chris Brewster

•Glinda Bridgforth Hodges

•Rajeev V. Date

•Saturnino Fanlo

•Peter Feld

•William I Jacobs

•Jeffrey B. Osher

•Ellen Richey

•George T. Shaheen

All members of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Risk Committee must be independent directors as defined by our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Members of the Audit Committee must also satisfy a separate SEC independence requirement, which provides that they may not accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from Green Dot or any of its subsidiaries other than their directors’ compensation. No member of any committee may be a partner, member or principal of a law firm, accounting firm or investment banking firm that accepts consulting or advisory fees from Green Dot or any of its subsidiaries. Our Board has determined that all members of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Risk Committee are independent, and all members of our Audit Committee satisfy the relevant SEC additional independence requirements for the members of such committee.

Committees of Our Board of Directors

Our Board has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Risk Committee. Each of these committees has a written charter approved by our Board. The composition and responsibilities of each committee are described below. Copies of the charters for each committee are available, without charge, upon request in writing to Green Dot Corporation, 4675 Cornell Road, Suite 280, Cincinnati, Ohio 45241, Attn: Corporate Secretary or by clicking on “Governance” in the investor relations section of our website, http://ir.greendot.com. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board.

INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

Audit
Committee

Compensation
Committee

Nominating
And Corporate
Governance
Committee

Risk
Committee

J. Chris Brewster

Rajeev V. Date

Saturnino Fanlo

Peter Feld

William I Jacobs

Jeffrey B. Osher

Ellen Richey

George T. Shaheen

Chairman of the Board

Financial Expert

Committee Chairperson

Committee Member

Table of Contents

Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance

The Board and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule and hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time. During 2022, the Board met 10 times, including telephonic meetings, the Audit Committee held 8 meetings, the Risk Committee held 4 meetings, the Compensation Committee held 5 meetings and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held 3 meetings. Members of committees also provided oversight of company initiatives through periodic discussions with management, which in the case of the Risk Committee, occurred regularly. During 2022, all of our directors attended more than 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings held by the Board and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which such director served (during the period which such director served).

Board Attendance at Annual Stockholders' Meeting

Our policy is to invite and encourage each member of our Board to be present at our annual meetings of stockholders. All 11 of our directors who were nominated for re-election attended the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Presiding Director of Non-Employee Director Meetings

The non-employee directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions without management to promote open and honest discussion. The Chairperson of the Board serves as the presiding director at these meetings when the Chairperson is a non-employee director. When the Chairperson of the Board is an employee, the Lead Independent Director will serve as the presiding director at these meetings.

Audit Committee


Current Members:						Responsibilities:
J. Chris Brewster (Chair)						Pursuant to its charter, our Audit Committee, among other things: •appoints our independent auditors; •approves the audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditors; •assesses the qualifications, performance and independence of our independent auditors; •monitors the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to financial statements or accounting matters; •reviews the integrity, adequacy and effectiveness of our accounting and financial reporting processes and the adequacy and effectiveness of our systems of internal control; •discusses the results of the audit with the independent auditors and reviews with management and the independent auditors our interim and year-end operating results; and •prepares the Audit Committee report that the SEC requires in our annual proxy statement.
Saturnino Fanlo
Jeffrey B. Osher
George T. Shaheen

Mr. Osher joined the Audit Committee in 2023.

Independence:
The composition of our Audit Committee meets the requirements for independence under current NYSE and SEC rules and regulations.

Meetings:
8 meetings during 2022.

Attendance:						Audit Committee Financial Experts
The average attendance for members of the Audit Committee in 2022 was 94%.						Each member of our Audit Committee is financially literate as required by current NYSE listing standards. In addition, our Board has determined that Mr. Brewster is an Audit Committee financial expert within the meaning of Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K based on his experience as Chief Financial Officer of various companies and Mr. Fanlo is an Audit Committee financial expert based on his experience as Chief Financial Officer of various companies and extensive experience in financial services and capital markets.

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee


Current Members:						Responsibilities:
George T. Shaheen (Chair)						Pursuant to its charter, our Compensation Committee, among other things: •reviews, approves and makes recommendations to our Board (as our Compensation Committee deems appropriate) regarding the compensation of our executive officers; •administers and interprets our stock and equity incentive plans; •reviews, approves and makes recommendations to our Board (as our Compensation Committee deems appropriate) with respect to equity and non-equity incentive compensation plans; and •establishes and reviews general strategies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees.
Saturnino Fanlo
Peter Feld
William I Jacobs

Mr. Feld joined the Compensation Committee in 2023.

Independence:
The composition of our Compensation Committee meets the requirements for independence under current NYSE and SEC rules and regulations.

Meetings:
5 meetings during 2022.

Attendance:
The average attendance for members of the Compensation Committee in 2022 was 100%.

From time to time, in accordance with the provisions of its charter, our Compensation Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding compensation for non-employee directors using a process similar to the one used for determining compensation for our executive officers, which is discussed in detail in “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below. Our Compensation Committee periodically reviews the market practice for non-employee director compensation at companies in our peer group in consultation with its independent compensation consultant.

Under its charter, our Compensation Committee has the authority to retain outside counsel or other advisors. Our Compensation Committee oversees the engagement of its independent compensation consultant and any other consultants it engages in addition to or in replacement of its independent consultant. The independent compensation consultant selected by our Compensation Committee works directly with our Compensation Committee (and not on behalf of management) to assist our Compensation Committee in satisfying its responsibilities and will not undertake projects for management without our Compensation Committee’s approval. Our Compensation Committee selected Mercer, LLC (“Mercer”) as its independent compensation consultant to provide advice and ongoing recommendations on executive compensation matters for 2022 as described in more detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Role of Consultant”. During 2022, Mercer also provided non-executive compensation services to the company. They included serving as investment advisor to our 401(k) plan, and consulting on, and serving as the broker for, our employee health plans. The decision to engage Mercer for these non-executive compensation services was made by management; however, all such services were ultimately approved by the Compensation Committee. The total fees we incurred for executive compensation consulting in 2022 was $336,533. The total fees incurred for the non-executive compensation services was $93,751. No individual consultant or personnel who provided executive compensation services received any additional compensation as a result of Mercer providing these other services. In the process of selecting Mercer as its compensation consultant, our Compensation Committee considered Mercer’s independence by taking into account the factors prescribed by the NYSE listing rules. Based on this evaluation, the Committee determined that no conflict of interest existed with respect to Mercer.

Table of Contents

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee


Current Members:						Responsibilities:
Rajeev V. Date (Chair)						Pursuant to its charter, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, among other things: •identifies, evaluates and recommends nominees and considers and evaluates stockholder nominees for election to our Board and its committees; •oversees the evaluation of the performance of our Board and its committees and of individual directors; •considers and makes recommendations to our Board regarding the composition of our Board and its committees; •reviews our legal compliance policies; •reviews and evaluates the Company’s programs, policies and practices relating to ESG issues and related disclosures and recommend to the Board the Company’s overall strategy with respect to ESG matters; and •makes recommendations to our Board concerning our corporate governance guidelines and other corporate governance matters.
William I Jacobs
Jeffrey B. Osher
Ellen Richey

Messrs. Date and Jacobs and Ms. Richey joined the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in 2023. Glinda Bridgforth Hodges previously served on the Board until her retirement in 2022 and Mr. Shaheen served until 2023.

Independence:
The composition of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the requirements for independence under current NYSE and SEC rules and regulations.

Meetings:
3 meetings during 2022.

Attendance:
The average attendance for members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in 2022 was 100%.

Table of Contents

Risk Committee


Current Members:						Responsibilities:
Ellen Richey (Chair)						Pursuant to its charter, our Risk Committee, among other things: •approves and periodically reviews the risk management framework for our company; •oversees and receives reports on the operation of our enterprise-wide risk management framework and Corporate Risk function; •reviews and discusses material risk exposures, including strategic, financial, information security, compliance and regulatory exposures, and monitors the steps management is taking to mitigate those exposures; •annually reviews and recommends to our Board the articulation and establishment of our company’s risk appetite; and •reviews and receives regular reports from the Chief Risk Officer and other members of management regarding management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our enterprise-wide risk program.
J. Chris Brewster
Rajeev V. Date
Peter Feld

Ms. Richey joined the Risk Committee in 2020 and Mr. Feld joined the Risk Committee in 2023.

Independence:
The composition of our Risk Committee meets the requirements for independence under current NYSE and SEC rules and regulations.

Meetings:
4 meetings during 2022.

Attendance:
The average attendance for members of the Risk Committee in 2022 was 88%.

Communication with Directors

Stockholders and interested parties who wish to communicate with our Board, non-employee members of our Board as a group, a committee of the Board or a specific member of our Board (including our Lead Independent Director, if any) may do so by letters addressed to the attention of our Corporate Secretary.

All communications are reviewed by the Corporate Secretary and provided to the members of the Board consistent with a screening policy providing that unsolicited items, sales materials and other routine items and items unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board not be relayed on to directors. Any communication that is not relayed is recorded in a log and made available to our Board.

The address for these communications is: Corporate Secretary, Green Dot Corporation, 4675 Cornell Road, Suite 280, Cincinnati, Ohio 45241.

Proxy Access

Our Bylaws permit a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning continuously for at least three years a number of shares of our Class A common stock that constitutes at least 3% of our outstanding shares of Class A common stock, to nominate and include in our proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, provided that the stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the Bylaws. The Bylaws specifically allow funds under common management to be treated as a single stockholder, and permit share lending with a five-day recall. The Bylaws do not contain any post-meeting holding requirements, do not have any limits on resubmission of failed nominees, and do not contain restrictions on third-party compensation.

Stockholder Engagement

Our Board values the input of our stockholders, and we are committed to engaging with our stockholders when appropriate. In the chart below, we detail the features of our stockholder engagement program.

Table of Contents


Before the Annual Meeting						Annual Stockholder Meeting
•Discuss stockholder proposals (if any).						•Conduct engagements with stockholders (as necessary).
•Publish our Annual Report and Proxy Statement.						•Receive voting results for Board and stockholder proposals.


After the Annual Meeting						Off-Season Engagement
•Discuss voting results from the Annual Meeting.						•If appropriate or requested, one-on-one meetings with stockholders.
•Review recent regulatory developments, and the Company’s own corporate governance documents, policies, and procedures.						•Attend and participate in investor and corporate governance-related events.
						•Evaluate and respond to stockholder feedback.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted codes of business conduct and ethics that, on a combined basis, apply to all of our board members, officers and employees (the “Code”). Our Audit Committee is responsible for annually reviewing and reporting to the Board on the adequacy of the Code and discussing with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee updating the Code and relevant policies. The Audit Committee considers waivers of the Code (other than transactions that are subject to review by the Board as a whole or any other committee of the Board), including waivers requested for executive officers and directors (other than where the potential waiver involves a member of the Committee, in which event, such waiver shall be subject to the review of the Board), and has authority to grant any such waivers.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and our Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are posted on the Investor Relations section of our website located at http://ir.greendot.com, by clicking on “Governance.” Any amendments or waivers of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and our Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics pertaining to a member of our Board or one of our executive officers will be disclosed on our website at the above-referenced address.

Information Security and Privacy Risk Oversight

The Green Dot Information Security Program applies to all our business operations and activities as well as those of our subsidiaries and seeks to:

•Ensure the security, confidentiality, and integrity of Green Dot’s information assets, including customer information, and to ensure the proper disposal of customer and consumer information;

•Protect all electronic information systems maintained by Green Dot and/or connected to Green Dot’s network against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of the systems;

•Promote and achieve a strong culture of safeguarding customer information throughout Green Dot by implementing a training program for employees and senior management so they have a working knowledge of the Green Dot policies associated with their responsibilities; and

•Ensure adequate senior management and Board oversight of Green Dot’s Information Security Program.

Governance, Roles and Responsibilities

Our Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) is responsible for maintaining and implementing the Information Security Program. The CISO and his staff are also tasked with establishing and maintaining adequate IT standards, system architecture standards, and internal controls. The Risk Committee oversees our Information Security Program and reviews and approves the program no less than annually. The Risk Committee works with our CISO to help validate that our technology direction is consistent with business objectives and that IT resources are used in

Table of Contents

an effective, efficient and risk appropriate manner. As discussed above, our Risk Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors, and Mr. Brewster and Ms. Richey have significant work experience related to information security issues and oversight.

The CISO reports to the Risk Committee quarterly on the overall status of the Information Security Program and Green Dot’s compliance with the program. At least annually, the CISO reviews the Information Security Program and any related policies and procedures and recommends any necessary changes. This review includes consideration of applicable law, feedback on the effectiveness of the program, and any supervisory or Internal Audit input. Any substantive changes to the program are recommended by the CISO to the Risk Committee.

The Risk Committee regularly briefs the full Board on these matters, and the Board receives regular updates on the status of the Information Security Program, including but not limited relevant cyber threats, roadmap and key initiative updates, and the management of information security risk.

Risk Identification and Assessment

Our information security department routinely identifies foreseeable internal and external threats that could result in unauthorized disclosure, misuse, alteration, or destruction of customer information or customer information systems. The CISO establishes specific procedures to assess the likelihood and potential damage of these threats, taking into consideration the sensitivity of customer, employee and business information and the adequacy of policies, procedures, information systems and other arrangements to control risk. Risk identification and assessment procedures address risks inherent in Green Dot’s operations, including the operations of Green Dot’s service providers, as well as risks arising from proposed changes to Green Dot’s operations.

Our information security department performs a risk assessment no less than annually, evaluating all information systems and identifying and assessing the risks to Green Dot’s assets and the impact these risks pose to Green Dot. Our information security department identifies information and the information systems to be protected including electronic and physical systems used to access, store, and transmit information. The risk assessment may be updated upon the acquisition of a new information system or the identification of a previously unidentified security risk. Based on the risk assessment(s) results, the program is evaluated to ensure it addresses the identified risks commensurate with information sensitivity as well as the complexity and scope of Green Dot’s activities. Risk assessments are presented to the Risk Committee for review.

Information Security Risk Insurance

Green Dot maintains information security risk insurance coverage to help defray the costs of an information security breach. This policy is currently active and is reviewed at least annually to ensure the amount of coverage we carry meets or exceeds our peer group. In the last three years, we have not experienced any incidences of information security breach, nor have we incurred any expenses, penalties or settlements as a result.

Service Provider Arrangements

Our Vendor Management Program is designed to ensure that sourcing decisions are made after evaluating the risks and performing robust due diligence. Our vendor management department works with internal business owners and third-party service providers to identify the access that a service provider may have to our systems and data and then collects the necessary documentation to obtain reasonable assurance of appropriate service provider controls. This documentation is provided to our information security department prior to engagement with the service provider, and their approval is required prior to vendor onboarding and, using a risk-based approach, annually thereafter.

Training

The CISO, the Chief Compliance Officer and the Director of Human Resources develop annual training related to information security and the effective use of Green Dot’s information systems. New employees and contractors are required to attend information security training as part of their orientation, acknowledging in writing that they have read and understand our Information Security Policy. All employees are required annually to take information security training and annually acknowledge that they have read and understand the Information Security Policy. Training awareness topics include authentication procedures, email security precautions, phishing awareness and regulatory and policy compliance. Training completion is tracked and reported on by the Compliance department.

The information security department is staffed with a qualified, technical team of engineers. Priority is given to scheduling training for the team throughout the year. All members of the security response team and those with security breach responsibilities are trained to ensure they are aware and capable of their responsibilities.

Table of Contents

PCI Compliance

Green Dot is a Level 1 Service Provider. The designation “Level 1 Service Provider” is reserved for large volume organizations like Green Dot that must pass annual independent on-site security audits that apply to the entire company. Such audits are performed by qualified security assessors that have been qualified by the PCI Security Standards Council and are intended to validate compliance and promote adherence to the PCI information security standards. The company is additionally externally audited to ensure SOC 2 compliance. These audits are conducted annually against multiple trust service principles.

Environmental, Social and Governance Matters

ESG Oversight

We are committed to making modern banking and money movement accessible for all, and we believe that managing our business in a sustainable manner is an important part of this goal. At the board level, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) programs, policies and practices. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s duties in this regard include reviewing and evaluating the company’s programs, policies and practices relating to ESG issues and related disclosures and recommending to the Board the company’s overall strategy with respect to ESG matters. In 2022, we continued to advance our ESG strategy by establishing a management-level ESG Steering Committee (the "ESG Steering Committee"). The purpose of the ESG Steering Committee is to assist the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to ESG matters, including by reviewing and approving programs, policies and practices relating to ESG issues and overseeing and monitoring the implementation of our ESG program.

Additionally, in 2022 we conducted an ESG Priority Assessment to guide our overall ESG strategy. The ESG Priority Assessment was designed to identify the environmental, social and governance topics with the greatest impact on our business strategy, operations and value creation. Together with an external ESG specialist, we conducted desktop research and external benchmarking to identify ESG topics that are relevant to our company, industry and key stakeholders, and the findings of this assessment informed our internal ESG strategy. We intend to continue to examine the ESG topics that are most relevant for our business and stakeholders as we further develop and advance our ESG strategy. We are committed to report on ESG in 2023. We believe this approach to ESG management helps to enable us to create value for both our stockholders and our other stakeholders, including our customers, partners, employees and communities. We will be publishing our inaugural ESG Report in 2023, which will highlight our ESG efforts.

Human Capital Management

We are focused on talent retention and development, employee experience, diversity, equity, including and belonging ("DEIB"), total rewards, employee health and safety, and organizational culture and ethics.

Talent Acquisition and Retention

We strive to maintain a workforce that is representative of the industry we serve, comprised of highly technical individuals, who enjoy pushing the boundaries of what is possible and are individually innovative. We work to retain employees in a number of ways, including having strong leadership and optimizing leaders and managers through effective training and development programs, providing employees the opportunity to learn new skills and to advance their careers, investing in technology, maintaining customer relationships, and providing competitive and equitable total rewards. For fiscal year 2022, our voluntary turnover rate was less than 15%, which we believe demonstrates the strength of our culture and professional development programs.

We offer industry specific training regarding regulatory standards and compliance, as well as self-directed learning through LinkedIn's learning platform. In 2023, we intend to launch a manager specific training that is designed to increase managerial capability in the areas of communication, engagement, coaching, inclusion and diversity, hiring and on-boarding, business skills, and ensuring an ethical and supportive work environment free from bias and harassment. As employees advance in their careers, our training framework seeks to build new capabilities with foundational leadership skills. Our leaders are further empowered to design bespoke learning experiences catered to their specific needs.

Employee Experience

We strive to continue enhancing employee engagement and use employee feedback to drive and improve processes that support our customers and ensure a deep understanding of our culture and vision among our employees. We embrace an open-door policy where collaboration across all levels of team members and across multiple departments is encouraged. We use annual employee engagement surveys to track and enhance

Table of Contents

employee sentiment and satisfaction; identify opportunities to instill our mission, vision, values, and business objectives throughout the organization; and build a performance-driven culture in a continually evolving remote and virtual environment. We use these surveys to solicit feedback about members of our senior leadership up to and including our Chief Executive Officer from employees at all levels of our organization. The three highest rated categories were how employees felt about their managers, DEIB, and overall job satisfaction. We also believe that ongoing employee performance feedback encourages greater engagement in our business and improved individual performance.

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging

We believe that a diverse, equitable and inclusive working environment with high belonging helps drive our mission and provides our workforce with the best opportunities for success. We are committed to improving representation and inclusion for employees at all levels of the organization. We conducted a DEIB analysis of our workforce in 2022 and are actively working to further enhance recruitment strategies and career development strategies in support of our initiatives.

We made additional improvements in closing the gender gap in 2022, ending the year with a workforce comprised of 55% male and 45% female employees. We grew our Employee Resources Groups by over 200% and implemented enterprise-wide events to create new levels of knowledge, empathy and community connection for our people. In 2023, we intend to further our diversity through hiring, career development, succession planning and leadership education. We also intend to introduce an educational platform for all employees to access that includes a variety of educational topics related to DEIB.

Total Rewards

To ensure our pay and benefits programs are consistent with our total rewards philosophy, we maintain best practices aimed at delivering fair and equitable compensation for employees based on their contribution and performance. We seek to promote equal pay for equal work in our hiring, annual reviews, and recognitions for performance. We benchmark for market practices, and regularly review our compensation against the market to ensure it remains competitive.

We offer a comprehensive and tailored set of benefits for employees and their families, providing protection from unexpected losses or medical expenses. Our benefits programs are tailored for the various geographies in which we operate, and include a variety of competitive health plans, in addition to dependent care flexible spending accounts, a 401(k) plan with a company match and auto-enrollment, employee stock purchase plan, and an employee assistance program.

Employee Health and Safety

The health and well-being of our workforce is one of our top priorities. To reinforce a deep connection and establish clear direction with our employees, we continue to provide regular leadership updates and management outreach.

Organizational Culture and Ethics

To promote the highest standards of honest and ethical business conduct and compliance with applicable laws, we have adopted codes of business conduct and ethics that apply to all of our board members, officers and employees.

In 2022, we launched GO2give, an employee giving (donation and volunteerism) platform that provides resources and opportunities for employees to support charitable causes that are meaningful to them. As part of the initiative, we began offering employees one paid time off day per year to volunteer, we introduced corporate donation matching, and we created programs encouraging employee connection and collaboration through charitable activities.

Table of Contents

NOMINATIONS PROCESS AND DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Nomination to the Board of Directors

Candidates for nomination to our Board are selected by our Board based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in accordance with the committee’s charter, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and our corporate governance guidelines. In recommending candidates for nomination, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates recommended by directors, officers, employees, stockholders and others, using the same criteria to evaluate all candidates. Evaluations of candidates generally involve a review of background materials, internal discussions and interviews with selected candidates as appropriate and, in addition, the committee may engage consultants or third-party search firms to assist in identifying and evaluating potential nominees.

Pursuant to the proxy access provisions of our Bylaws, an eligible stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders may nominate one or more director candidates to be included in our proxy materials for our next annual meeting of stockholders. The nomination notice and other materials required by these provisions must be delivered or mailed to and received by our Corporate Secretary in writing at the following address: Corporate Secretary, Green Dot Corporation, 4675 Cornell Road, Suite 280, Cincinnati, Ohio 45241, with a copy to Green Dot Corporation, Attn: General Counsel at the same address. When submitting nominees for inclusion in our proxy materials pursuant to the proxy access provisions of our Bylaws, stockholders must follow the notice procedures and provide the information required by our Bylaws.

Additional information regarding the process for properly submitting stockholder nominations for candidates for membership on our Board, including the deadlines for submitting a nominee for inclusion in our proxy materials for our next annual meeting of stockholders pursuant to the proxy access provisions of our Bylaws, is set forth below under “Additional Information - Stockholder Proposals to be Presented at Next Annual Meeting.”

Director Qualifications

With the goal of developing an experienced and highly-qualified Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for developing and recommending to the Board the desired qualifications, expertise and characteristics of members of our Board, including the specific minimum qualifications that the committee believes must be met by a committee-recommended nominee for membership on the Board and any specific qualities or skills that the committee believes are necessary for one or more of the members of the Board to possess.

Since the identification, evaluation and selection of qualified directors is a complex and subjective process that requires consideration of many intangible factors, and will be significantly influenced by the particular needs of the Board from time to time, our Board has not adopted a specific set of minimum qualifications, qualities or skills that are necessary for a nominee to possess, other than those that are necessary to meet U.S. legal, regulatory and NYSE listing requirements and the provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, corporate governance guidelines and charters of the Board’ committees. In addition, neither the Board nor the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying nominees. When considering nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may take into consideration many factors, including, among other things, a candidate’s independence, integrity, skills, financial and other expertise, breadth of experience and knowledge about our business or industry and willingness and ability to devote adequate time and effort to responsibilities of the Board in the context of its existing composition. Through the nomination process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to promote Board membership that reflects a diversity of business experience, expertise, viewpoints, personal backgrounds and other characteristics that are expected to contribute to the Board’s overall effectiveness. The brief biographical description of each director set forth in Proposal No. 1 below includes the primary individual experience, qualifications, qualities and skills of each of our directors that led to the conclusion that each director should serve as a member of our Board at this time.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board currently consists of 9 directors, all of whom are nominated and standing for election at the 2023 Annual Meeting.

At the recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board proposes that the nominees named below be elected as directors for a one-year term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

Information regarding the tenure, board profile and refreshment of our director nominees is set forth in the charts below.

Board Nominee Tenure


0 - 5 Years:	6 - 8 Years:	8+ Years:	Average tenure of all director nominees: 4.2 years
44%	44%	11%

Board Nominee Profile

Board Refreshment

Biographical information for each of the nominees is set forth below. We have highlighted in that section the specific experience, qualifications and skills that led the Board to conclude that each individual should continue to serve as a director of Green Dot.

Nominees to the Board of Directors

The nominees, and his or her age, occupation and length of board service as of April 3, 2023, are provided in the table below. Additional biographical descriptions of the nominees are set forth in the text below the table.

Table of Contents

Name of Director/Nominee

Age

Principal Occupation

Director Since

J. Chris Brewster (1)(2)

Former Chief Financial Officer, Cardtronics, Inc.

April 2016

Rajeev V. Date (2)(3)

Managing Partner, Fenway Summer LLC

April 2016

Saturnino Fanlo (1)(4)

Former Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, Human Longevity, Inc.

May 2016

Peter Feld (2)(4)

Managing Member and Head of Research, Starboard Value LP

March 2022

George Gresham

President and CEO, Green Dot Corporation

October 2021

William I Jacobs* (3)(4)

Board Member, Repay Holdings Corporation

April 2016

Jeffrey B. Osher (1)(3)

Founder, No Street Capital

March 2020

Ellen Richey (2)(3)

Former Vice Chairman and Chief Risk Officer, Visa, Inc.

April 2020

George T. Shaheen (1)(4)

Managing Member, Andersen

September 2013

_____________

* Chairperson of the Board

(1)Member of the Audit Committee

(2)Member of the Risk Committee

(3)Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

(4)Member of the Compensation Committee

Director Biographies


J. Chris Brewster

Age:	Director Since:	Committees	Other Public Directorships
73	2016	Audit (Chair), Risk	None

J. Chris Brewster served as our interim President from January 2020 to the end of March 2020 and has served on our Board of Directors since April 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Brewster served as Chief Financial Officer of Cardtronics, Inc., a provider of automated consumer financial services through ATMs and other devices, from February 2004 until February 2016, when he transitioned to an executive advisor to that company and then served in that capacity until February 2017. Prior to joining Cardtronics, from September 2002 until February 2004, Mr. Brewster provided consulting services to various businesses. From October 2001 until September 2002, Mr. Brewster served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Imperial Sugar Company, a publicly traded refiner and marketer of sugar and related products. From March 2000 to September 2001, Mr. Brewster served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WorldOil.com, a privately held internet, trade magazine, book and catalog publishing business. From January 1997 to February 2000, Mr. Brewster served as a partner of Bellmeade Capital Partners, LLC, a merchant banking firm specializing in the consolidation of fragmented industries. From March 1992 to September 1996, Mr. Brewster served as Chief Financial Officer of Sanifill, Inc., a publicly traded environmental services company. From May 1984 to March 1992, Mr. Brewster served as Chief Financial Officer of National Convenience Stores, Inc., a publicly traded operator of 1,100 convenience stores. He has served as Chairman of the Audit Committee of the board of directors of R3, LLC since September 2017, a privately held financial technology company. He has also served as a director for the Houston Area Parkinson Society since January 2015. Mr. Brewster holds a B.S. degree in industrial management from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an M.B.A. degree from Harvard Business School. We believe Mr. Brewster should serve as a member of our Board of Directors based on his extensive management experience, the perspective he brings as a Chief Financial Officer of various companies, including most recently holding a long tenured CFO position at a company highly correlated with Green Dot’s customer base and business model, and his consumer financial services industry experience more broadly.


Rajeev V. Date

Age:	Director Since:	Committees	Other Public Directorships
52	2016	Risk, Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)	Customers Bancorp, Inc.

Rajeev V. Date has served on our Board of Directors since April 2016 and is the founder of Fenway Summer LLC, an advisory and venture investment firm focused on financial services and has served as Managing Partner of the firm since April 2013. Previously, Mr. Date served in a variety of capacities at the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Among other roles, Mr. Date served as the

Table of Contents

first-ever Deputy Director of the CFPB, and also acted as the CFPB’s interim leader for several months. Prior to his public service, Mr. Date was a Managing Director in the Financial Institutions Group at Deutsche Bank Securities. From 2001 to 2007, Mr. Date served in various capacities at Capital One Financial, a bank holding company, including most recently as Senior Vice President for Corporate Strategy and Development. Mr. Date began his career in the financial institutions practice of McKinsey & Company. Mr. Date has served on the boards of directors of Circle Internet Financial, Ltd. since October 2013; LRI Holdco and its subsidiaries Tilia Inc. and Linden Research Inc. since January 2021; and Customers Bancorp, Inc. since September 2022. He previously served on the boards of directors of FS Card Inc. from January 2014 until December 2018; Megalith Financial Acquisition Corp. from August 2018 until January 2021; Prosper Marketplace from July 2013 until March 2021; Grasshopper Bancorp from May 2019 until September 2021; Better Mortgage Inc from May 2019 until January 2022; and College Ave Student Loans LLC from December 2014 to July 2022. Mr. Date holds a B.S. with Highest Honors in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the University of California at Berkeley, and a J.D., magna cum laude, from the Harvard Law School. We believe Mr. Date should serve as a member of our Board of Directors based on his extensive experience in the private and public sector, the perspective he brings as both an investor and board member at leading Fintech companies and his understanding of the unique needs of operations and governance at highly regulated bank holding companies.


Saturnino "Nino" Fanlo

Age:	Director Since:	Committees	Other Public Directorships
62	2016	Audit, Compensation	None

Saturnino “Nino” Fanlo has served on our Board of Directors since May 2016. Mr. Fanlo previously served as the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Human Longevity, Inc., a genomic-based, health intelligence company, from June 2017 to June 2018. Prior to joining Human Longevity, Mr. Fanlo served as President and Chief Financial Officer of Social Finance, Inc., a marketplace lender and financial services company, from June 2012 to May 2017. He also served as Chief Operating Officer of that company from December 2013 to August 2015 and as a member of its board of directors from June 2012 to September 2015. Previously, Mr. Fanlo served as Senior Advisor at Golden Gate Capital, a private equity firm, from April 2009 to February 2011; as Chief Executive Officer and a director of KKR Financial Holdings LLC, a subsidiary of KKR & Co. L.P. from 2004 to 2008; as a director of Capmark Financial Group Inc. from 2006 until 2009; as Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Wells Fargo & Company from July 2000 to June 2004; as a founder and, from August 2001 to June 2004, President of Sutter Advisors LLC, a registered investment advisor formed in 2001 and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo; and as Vice President at Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. from 1990 to 1995. Mr. Fanlo also served in investment banking and asset management roles at Credit Suisse Group AG, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Australian Capital Equity Pty Ltd. Mr. Fanlo holds a B.A. in economics from Haverford College. We believe Mr. Fanlo should serve as a member of our Board of Directors based on his extensive experience in financial services and capital markets.


Peter Feld

Age:	Director Since:	Committees	Other Public Directorships
44	2022	Risk, Compensation	Gen Digital Inc.

Peter Feld has served on our Board of Directors since March 2022. Since April 2011, he has served as the Managing Member, Portfolio Manager and Head of Research at Starboard Value LP. Prior to Starboard Value LP, he served as Managing Director of Ramius LLC and a Portfolio Manager of Ramius Value and Opportunity Master Fund Ltd. from November 2008 to April 2011. Prior to that, he served as a director at Ramius LLC from February 2007 to November 2008. He currently serves on the board of Gen Digital Inc. (f/k/a NortonLifeLock), a cybersecurity software and services company, since September 2018. Mr. Feld previously served as a member of the boards of directors of GCP Applied Technologies, Inc., a technology company, from June 2020 until it was acquired by Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A. in September 2022, Magellan Health, Inc., a healthcare company, from March 2019 until it was acquired by Centene Corporation in January 2022, AECOM, a multinational infrastructure firm, from November 2019 to June 2020, Marvell Technology Group Ltd., a storage, networking and connectivity semiconductor solutions company, from May 2016 to June 2018, The Brink’s Company, a global leader in security-related services, from January 2016 to November 2017, Insperity, Inc., an industry-leading HR services provider, from March 2015 to June 2017, Darden Restaurants, Inc., a full-service restaurant company, from October 2014 to September 2015, Tessera Technologies, Inc. (n/k/a Xperi Corporation), a leading product and technology licensing company, from June 2013 to April 2014 and Integrated Device Technology, Inc., a company that designed,

Table of Contents

developed, manufactured and marketed a range of semiconductor solutions for the advanced communications, computing and consumer industries, from June 2012 to February 2014. Mr. Feld holds a B.A. in economics from Tufts University. We believe Mr. Feld should serve as a member of our Board of Directors based on his extensive experience serving on boards of companies spanning technology, information security, healthcare, and other consumer and B2B growth sectors.


George Gresham

Age:	Director Since:	Committees	Other Public Directorships
56	2021	None	None

George Gresham has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since October 2022 and has served on our Board of Directors since October 2021. Previously, Mr. Gresham served as our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer from October 2021 to October 2022. Prior to joining Green Dot, since July 2013, Mr. Gresham served as owner and Chief Executive Officer of Granite Reef Advisers, Inc., an advisory firm focused on providing third-party assistance in acquisition target evaluation and execution, and as a director from May 2016 until May 2019. Mr. Gresham previously served on our Board of Directors from May 2016 to May 2019. Mr. Gresham also previously served on the board of directors of EML Payments (EML.AX), an Australian payment solutions provider from April 2020 to August 2021 and on the board of directors and as Chairman of the Audit Committee of BluePay, Inc., a provider of technology-enabled merchant processing services, from July 2013 to November 2017. He also served on the board of directors and as Chairman of the Audit Committee of SterlingBackcheck, Inc. from November 2014 to June 2015; as the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of NetSpend Holdings, Inc. from May 2010 through June 2013; as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Global Cash Access, Inc. from February 2008 to May 2010; as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Executive Vice President of eFunds Corporation from May 2002 to October 2007; and in various roles at Deloitte LLP from 1991 to 2002. Since March 2017, Mr. Gresham has served as Co-Founder and Chairman of the board of directors of Dama Technologies. Mr. Gresham holds a B.S. in accountancy from Northern Arizona University and an M.B.A. from the Thunderbird School of Global Management. We believe Mr. Gresham should serve as a member of our Board of Directors based on the perspective and experience that he brings to our Board of Directors as our Chief Executive Officer and from his extensive financial services experience and his prior experience on our Board of Directors.


William I Jacobs

Age:	Director Since:	Committees	Other Public Directorships
81	2016	Nominating and Corporate Governance, Compensation	Repay Holdings Corp.

William I Jacobs has served as our Chairperson of the Board since June 2016 and served as our interim Chief Executive Officer from January 2020 to the end of March 2020. Mr. Jacobs served as a member of the board of directors of Global Payments, Inc., a payment processing services company, from 2001 to April 2022, during which time he served as the Chairman of the board of directors from June 2014 until September 2019. He also served as Lead Independent Director of that company from 2003 to May 2014 and as one of its business advisors from August 2002 until September 2019. Prior to joining the board of directors of Global Payments, Mr. Jacobs served as Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of The New Power Company from 2000 to 2002. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Jacobs served in various senior roles at MasterCard International. Prior to MasterCard, Mr. Jacobs served as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer of Financial Security Assurance, Inc., from 1984 to 1994. Mr. Jacobs previously served on the board of directors of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp., Investment Technology Group, Inc., and Alpharma, Inc. Mr. Jacobs has served on the board of directors of Repay Holdings Corporation, a publicly traded financial technology company, since July 2019. He holds a B.S. degree in business administration from American University and a J.D. from American University Washington College of Law. We believe Mr. Jacobs should serve as a member of our Board of Directors based on his extensive management experience in the financial services sector, including in finance and operations and his experience as a board member of other public companies, including committee service. In particular, we believe Mr. Jacobs’ experience as a long-serving member on the board of directors of Global Payments, including serving as Chairman during the period of time that company completed one of the largest acquisitions ever in the payments industry, will provide Green Dot with highly relevant and specific expertise in the payments and financial services industries.

Table of Contents


Jeffrey B. Osher

Age:	Director Since:	Committees	Other Public Directorships
46	2020	Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance	None

Jeffrey B. Osher founded No Street Capital, an investment management firm, in December 2018 and served as an advisor to our Board of Directors from March 2017 until March 2020 when he joined our Board of Directors. Prior to founding No Street Capital, Mr. Osher served as a Portfolio Manager at Harvest Capital Strategies, an SEC-registered investment advisor, from December 2005 to December 2018 and as its analyst from August 2002 to December 2005. Prior to his tenure at Harvest Capital Strategies, Mr. Osher served as an analyst at The Dowd Company, an investment management company, where he focused on technology and emerging growth companies. Prior to that, Mr. Osher also worked at Montgomery Securities, an investment bank, where he focused on equity research. He has served on the board of directors of The Seal Family Foundation since January 2016 and of Mobile Infrastructure Corp since August 2021. Since August 2021, Mr. Osher has also served as the manager of Color Up, LLC. Mr. Osher holds a B.A. in political science and history from Miami University of Ohio, and he is a chartered financial analyst. We believe Mr. Osher should serve as a member of our Board of Directors based on his extensive experience in financial services and capital markets.


Ellen Richey

Age:	Director Since:	Committees	Other Public Directorships
74	2020	Risk (Chair), Nominating and Corporate Governance	Cantaloupe, Inc. Green Visor Financial Technology Acquisition Corporation

Ellen Richey has served on our Board of Directors since April 2020. Ms. Richey previously served as the Vice Chairman of Risk and Public Policy at Visa Inc., a global payment technology provider, from October 2014 to May 2019 and as its Chief Risk Officer from February 2017 to July 2019. Ms. Richey also concurrently served as Visa's Chief Legal Officer and Chief Enterprise Risk Officer in 2014 and as Visa's Chief Enterprise Risk Officer from October 2007 to December 2013. Ms. Richey also served as a member of Visa’s executive committee throughout her tenure with Visa. In those positions, she was responsible for Visa’s risk, audit, compliance, payment system security and public policy teams and was also responsible for Visa's legal function in 2014. Prior to joining Visa, she worked at Washington Mutual Inc. as senior vice president of enterprise risk management and executive vice president of card services from October 2005 to June 2006. Prior to that, Ms. Richey served as the Vice Chairman of Providian Financial Corporation, where she had responsibility for the enterprise risk management, legal, corporate governance, corporate relations, compliance and audit functions from October 1999 to December 2005. Ms. Richey has also served on the board of directors of Cantaloupe, Inc. (formerly USA Technologies, Inc.) since May 2020 and as executive vice president and as a member of the board of directors of Green Visor Financial Technology Acquisition Corporation l since May 2021. Since 2007, she has served as a member on the board of directors of Girl Scouts of Northern California. Ms. Richey holds a B.A. in linguistics and far eastern languages from Harvard University and a J.D. from Stanford Law School, and she served as a law clerk for Associate Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr. of the United States Supreme Court from 1979 to 1980. We believe Ms. Richey should serve as a member of our Board of Directors based on her extensive enterprise risk management and public policy experience, and expertise in the payments and financial services industries.


George T. Shaheen

Age:	Director Since:	Committees	Other Public Directorships
78	2013	Audit, Compensation (Chair)	Marcus & Millichap, Inc., NetApp, Inc

George T. Shaheen has served on our Board of Directors since September 2013, and as our Lead Independent Director from January 2020 to April 2020. Mr. Shaheen has served as a Managing Director of Andersen, an international tax and legal firm since July 2022. Prior to that, Mr. Shaheen was the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of Entity Labs, a privately held technology company in the data collection, storage and analytics industry from December 2006 until July 2009. Mr. Shaheen was the Chief Executive Officer of Siebel Systems, Inc., a CRM software company, from April 2005 until the sale of the company in January 2006. From October 1999 to April 2001, he served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Webvan Group, Inc., an online grocery and delivery service. Previously, he was the Chief Executive Officer and Global

Table of Contents

Managing Partner of Andersen Consulting, which later became Accenture, from 1988 to 1999. Mr. Shaheen has served on the board of directors of Marcus & Millichap, Inc., a commercial real estate brokerage company, since October 2013, [24]7.ai, a privately held venture backed customer service technology company, since December 2003 and NetApp, Inc., an enterprise technology company that provides data storage systems, since June 2004. Mr. Shaheen previously served on the board of directors of Korn/Ferry International, an international executive search and consulting firm, from April 2020 until September 2022. Mr. Shaheen received a B.S. degree in business and M.B.A. degree from Bradley University. We believe Mr. Shaheen should serve as a member of our Board of Directors based on his extensive management experience, the perspective he brings as a Chief Executive Officer of various companies and his experience as a board member of other public companies.

There are no familial relationships among our directors and officers.

Director Compensation

Director Compensation Highlights

•Fees for committee service and service on the Board and committees of subsidiary bank to differentiate individual pay based on workload

•Emphasis on equity in the overall compensation mix

•Full-value equity grants under a fixed-value annual grant policy with time-based vesting

•No performance-based equity awards

•A robust stock ownership guideline set at four times the annual cash retainer to support stockholder alignment

•Stockholder approved governance limit of $750,000 on the total value of equity compensation (taken together with any cash fees paid during a calendar year for services as a director) that may be granted to a non-employee director each calendar year

•Policies prohibiting hedging and pledging by our directors

Annual and Meeting Fees. During 2022, our non-employee directors were entitled to receive the following annualized cash compensation. We pay the annual retainer fee and any additional annual fees to each director in equal quarterly installments.

•$70,000 annual cash retainer

•$30,000 annual fee for chairing our Audit Committee and $12,500 for serving as a non-chair member of our Audit Committee

•$25,000 annual fee for chairing our Compensation Committee and $10,000 for serving as a non-chair member of our Compensation Committee

•$25,000 annual fee for chairing our Risk Committee and $10,000 for serving as a non-chair member of our Risk Committee

•$20,000 annual fee for chairing our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and $7,000 for serving as a non-chair member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

•$70,000 annual fee for the Chairperson of the Board

•$70,000 annual fee for Lead Independent Director (when applicable)

During 2022, we also compensated any non-employee director who served on the Board of Directors, Audit Committee, Risk Committee or Community Reinvestment Act Committee of our subsidiary bank. The annual retainer fee for board service was $70,000, the additional annual retainer fee for Audit Committee service was $30,000 for the chair of the Audit Committee and $12,500 for each of the Audit Committee's other members, the additional annual retainer fee for Risk Committee service was $25,000 for the chair of the Risk Committee and $10,000 for each of the Risk Committee's other members and the additional annual retainer fee for Community Reinvestment Act Committee service was $5,000.

Annual Equity Awards. Each non-employee director is entitled to an annual grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with a grant date fair value of $125,000. In addition, each non-employee member of the Board who also serves on the board of directors of our subsidiary bank is entitled to an additional grant of RSUs having a fair market value on the grant date equal to $125,000. Such amounts reflect the fact that board service generally, and service on the board of directors of the subsidiary bank in particular, takes up an increasing amount of time each year and

Table of Contents

are within the stockholder approved limits for director compensation under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, non-employee directors, who are appointed and commence service prior to an annual meeting of stockholders, may receive pro-rated RSU grants.

Generally, all such awards are granted at each annual meeting of stockholders and will vest upon the earlier of one year or the annual meeting of stockholders following the grant date. Non-employee directors, who are appointed and commence service prior to an annual meeting of stockholders, may receive fully or partially vested awards depending on when the awards are granted and when their service commences. In the event of a merger or consolidation in which Green Dot is not the surviving corporation or another similar change in control transaction involving Green Dot, all unvested RSU awards made to non-employee directors under the policy described above will accelerate and vest in full. All awards to non-employee directors, including those described above and any awards to a non-employee director who first becomes a member of our Board, will be made on a discretionary basis under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, based on the recommendation of our Compensation Committee.

Non-employee directors are also eligible for and may elect to receive medical, dental and vision benefits. These benefits are available to our employees, officers and directors generally and in operation provide for the same method of allocation of benefits between director, management and non-management participants.

Non-employee directors receive no other form of remuneration, perquisites or benefits but are reimbursed for their expenses in attending meetings, including travel, meal and other expenses incurred to attend meetings solely among the non-employee directors.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines. Our Board has instituted the following stock ownership guidelines for its non-employee directors to better align our directors’ interests with those of our stockholders. Director guidelines are determined as a multiple of the annual cash retainer for board membership (excluding any fees received for board leadership and committee chairmanship). The director guidelines are established as four times a director’s annual cash retainer. Shares that count toward meeting the stock ownership guidelines include shares owned outright, full value awards (e.g., RSUs) and shares owned directly by the director’s spouse, dependent children and/or trust. Directors have five years from appointment of the board to acquire and hold the pre-determined level of shares. As of April 3, 2023, all our non-employee directors have either satisfied their ownership requirement or have additional time to satisfy such requirement.

No Hedging or Pledging. Under the company’s Insider Trading Policy, no director may acquire, sell or trade in any interest or position relating to the future price of the company’s securities, such as a put option, a call option or a short sale. In addition, directors are prohibited from holding company securities in a margin account or pledging company securities as collateral for a loan.

Director Compensation Table. The following table provides information for the year ended December 31, 2022 regarding all compensation awarded to or earned by each person who served as a non-employee director for some portion or all of 2022.


Director Compensation - 2022
Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1)	Stock Awards ($)(2)(3)	Option Awards ($)(3)	All Other Compensation ($)(4)	Total ($)

J. Chris Brewster	205,000	249,993	—	—	454,993
Glinda Bridgforth Hodges(5)	123,750	249,993	—	10,248	383,991
Rajeev V. Date	177,500	249,993	—	—	427,493
Saturnino Fanlo	175,000	249,993	—	—	424,993
Peter Feld	52,500	124,996	—	—	177,496
William I Jacobs	275,000	249,993	—	—	524,993
Jeffrey B. Osher	77,000	124,996	—	—	201,996
Ellen Richey	80,000	124,996	—	—	204,996
George T. Shaheen	197,000	249,993	—	—	446,993

_____________

(1)Represents (i) an annual retainer fee plus any additional annual fees for service on our committees or as our Chairperson of the Board and (ii) in the case of Mr. Brewster, Ms. Bridgforth Hodges, Mr. Date, Mr. Fanlo, Mr. Jacobs and Mr. Shaheen, fees for their service as directors or committee members of our subsidiary bank, as set forth in the table below.

Table of Contents


Name	Green Dot Board Fees ($)	Bank Board Fees ($)	Total ($)

J. Chris Brewster	110,000	95,000	205,000
Glinda Bridgforth Hodges	67,500	56,250	123,750
Rajeev V. Date	107,500	70,000	177,500
Saturnino Fanlo	92,500	82,500	175,000
Peter Feld	52,500	—	52,500
William I Jacobs	160,000	115,000	275,000
Jeffrey B. Osher	77,000	—	77,000
Ellen Richey	80,000	—	80,000
George T. Shaheen	114,500	82,500	197,000

(2)Amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate full grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation for awards of RSUs granted during 2022, which include (i) each non-employee director’s annual RSU grant for their service on the Board following the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and (ii) in the case of Mr. Brewster, Ms. Bridgforth Hodges, Mr. Date, Mr. Fanlo, Mr. Jacobs and Mr. Shaheen, the non-employee director’s annual RSU grant for his or her service as a director of our subsidiary bank following the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


Name	Green Dot Board 2022 Annual Grant ($)	Bank Board 2022 Annual Grant ($)	Other RSU Award ($)	Total ($)

J. Chris Brewster	124,996	124,997	—	249,993
Glinda Bridgforth Hodges	124,996	124,997	—	249,993
Rajeev V. Date	124,996	124,997	—	249,993
Saturnino Fanlo	124,996	124,997	—	249,993
Peter Feld	124,996	—	—	124,996
William I Jacobs	124,996	124,997	—	249,993
Jeffrey B. Osher	124,996	—	—	124,996
Ellen Richey	124,996	—	—	124,996
George T. Shaheen	124,996	124,997	—	249,993

(3)Our non-employee directors who served in 2022 held the following number of unexercised stock options and unvested RSUs as of December 31, 2022.


Name	Stock Options Outstanding (a)	Unvested Restricted Stock Units (b)

J. Chris Brewster	—	8,440
Glinda Bridgforth Hodges	—	—
Rajeev V. Date	—	8,440
Saturnino Fanlo	—	8,440
Peter Feld	—	4,220
William I Jacobs	—	8,440
Jeffrey B. Osher	—	4,220
Ellen Richey	—	4,220
George T. Shaheen	16,048	8,440

(a) These stock options are fully vested.

(b) These RSUs will vest upon the earlier of one year or the annual meeting of stockholders following the grant date.

(4)The amount shown in this column represents the cost of health insurance benefits provided to Ms. Bridgforth Hodges.

(5)Ms. Bridgforth Hodges retired from the Board, effective October 1, 2022.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES LISTED HEREIN.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 2

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as Green Dot’s principal independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit of Green Dot’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. As a matter of good corporate governance, our Audit Committee has decided to submit its selection of principal independent registered public accounting firm to stockholders for ratification. In the event that this appointment of Ernst & Young LLP is not ratified by our stockholders, the Audit Committee will review its future selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Green Dot’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Our Audit Committee first approved Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors in 2005, and Ernst & Young LLP audited Green Dot’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the meeting, in which case they will be given an opportunity to make a statement at the meeting if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

We regularly review the services provided by and fees of the independent registered public accounting firm. These services and fees are also reviewed with our Audit Committee annually. In accordance with standard policy, Ernst & Young LLP periodically rotates the individuals who are responsible for Green Dot’s audit.

In addition to performing the audit of Green Dot’s consolidated financial statements, Ernst & Young LLP provided various other services during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Our Audit Committee has determined that Ernst & Young LLP’s provision of these services, which are described below, does not impair Ernst & Young LLP’s independence from Green Dot. The aggregate fees billed for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 for each of the following categories of services are as follows:


Fees Billed to Green Dot	2022		2021
Audit fees(1)	$	1,850,400	$	1,738,000
Audit related fees(2)	—		—
Tax fees(3)	220,361		218,494
All other fees(4)	4,980		—
Total fees	$	2,075,741	$	1,956,494

(1)“Audit fees” represents fees for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, the review of our quarterly consolidated financial statements and audit services provided in connection with other statutory and regulatory filings.

(2)“Audit related fees” represents fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements, consents related to SEC registration statements, and other accounting and financial reporting consultation or research work necessary to comply with financial accounting and reporting standards.

(3)“Tax fees” represents fees for tax compliance and advice. Tax advice fees encompass a variety of permissible services, including technical tax advice related to federal and state income tax matters; assistance with sales tax; and assistance with tax audits.

(4)“All Other Fees” are fees charged by Ernst & Young LLP for services not described above. The fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP in this category were for annual subscriptions and software licenses, including EY Atlas, a proprietary online resource for accounting research online, online training materials and industry publications.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval and the fees for the services performed to date.

All of the services relating to the fees described in the table above were approved by our Audit Committee.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL NO. 2.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 3

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, stockholders are entitled to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs, as disclosed in this proxy statement. Accordingly, you are being asked to vote on the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to Green Dot Corporation’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion set forth on pages 48 to 77 of this proxy statement, is hereby approved.”

As described more fully in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, we believe our NEOs are compensated in a manner consistent with our performance-based pay philosophy and corporate governance best practices.

While the results of this advisory vote are not binding, our compensation committee will consider the outcome of the vote in deciding whether to take any action because of the vote and when making future compensation decisions for NEOs. Our current policy is to hold such an advisory vote each year, and we expect to hold another advisory vote with respect to executive compensation at the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL NO. 3.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 4

ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF AN ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are requesting that you cast a non-binding advisory vote with respect to how frequently we should seek a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table of future proxy statements, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote. Under this Proposal No. 4, you may vote on whether you would prefer to have a “say-on-pay” vote every year, every 2 years or every 3 years in response to the resolution set forth below. Alternatively, you may abstain from casting a vote.

“RESOLVED, that the option of 1 year, 2 years, or 3 years that receives the highest number of votes cast for this resolution will be determined to be the preferred frequency with which Green Dot Corporation is to hold a stockholder vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules (including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion).”

Our Board believes that “say-on-pay” votes should be conducted every year so that our stockholders may provide us with their direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices, as disclosed in our proxy statement each year. Accordingly, our Board recommends that you vote for every “1 year.”

While this advisory vote on the frequency of the “say-on-pay” vote is non-binding, our Board and Compensation Committee will give careful consideration to the choice that receives the most votes when considering the frequency of future “say-on-pay” votes. We are required to solicit stockholder votes on the frequency of future say-on-pay proposals at least once every six years, and we expect to hold another advisory vote with respect to executive compensation at the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR A “1 YEAR” FREQUENCY FOR FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ON PROPOSAL NO. 4.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 5

APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT OF THE 2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

We are asking you and the other stockholders to approve the amendment of our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan,” and as amended, the “Amended 2010 Plan”), in order to increase the number of shares of our Class A common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to the 2010 Plan by 2,400,000 shares. We consider the 2010 Plan to be a vital element of our employee compensation program and believe that the continued ability to grant stock awards at competitive levels is in the best interest of Green Dot and its stockholders. Accordingly, you are being requested to approve the Amended 2010 Plan.

Reasons to Approve the Amended 2010 Plan

Approval of the Amended 2010 Plan will increase the number of shares of our Class A common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to the 2010 Plan by 2,400,000 shares (the “Share Increase”). As of April 3, 2023, a total of 1,458,162 shares of our Class A common stock remained available for future grants under the 2010 Plan. We believe that the current share reserve amount is insufficient to meet our future needs with respect to attracting, motivating and retaining key executives and employees in a competitive market for talent. We believe the Share Increase will be sufficient to enable us to grant stock awards under the 2010 Plan for approximately the next two years, based on historical grant and forfeiture levels, the recent market prices of our Class A common stock, and anticipated use of equity awards as an incentive and retention tool as we continue to compete for talent.

The table below shows the stock awards that were outstanding under the 2010 Plan as of April 3, 2023. As of April 3, 2023, the closing price of our Class A common stock as reported on the NYSE was $16.80 per share.


Shares underlying outstanding stock options (1)						23,698
Shares underlying outstanding time-based full value awards (2)						2,107,559
Shares underlying outstanding performance-based full value awards (3)						1,974,010
Shares available for issuance pursuant to future grant						1,458,162

(1) As of April 3, 2023, outstanding stock options had a weighted average exercise price of $22.88 per share and a weighted average remaining term of 0.12 years.

(2) Consists of restricted stock units (“RSUs”).

(3) Consists of performance units (“PRSUs”). The number of shares underlying PRSUs assumes maximum performance for awards that remain subject to completion of performance metrics.

* These amounts do not reflect certain inducement awards that were granted to Daniel R. Henry outside of the 2010 Plan in March 2020 and shares subject to outstanding purchase rights under our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

The table below shows net annual dilution and other metrics relating to equity awards under the 2010 Plan for the last three fiscal years.


Metric	2022	2021	2020	Average
Annual Dilution (1)	0%	2.3%	2.9%	1.7%
Annual Burn Rate (2)	2.0%	3.5%	5.3%	3.6%
Year-End Overhang (3)	11.9%	12.4%	13.5%	12.6%

____________

(1) Calculated by dividing (a) the number of shares underlying awards granted to all recipients during the year, minus award cancellations and forfeitures during the year, by (b) the number of shares outstanding at year-end.

(2) Calculated by dividing (a) the number of shares underlying awards granted during the year to all recipients by (b) the number of shares outstanding at year-end.

(3) Calculated by dividing the sum of (a) the number of shares underlying outstanding awards and (b) shares available for future awards, by (c) the number of shares outstanding, in each case at year-end.

The table below shows the number of performance awards (all of which consisted of PRSUs) granted at target, vested and forfeited within the last three fiscal years.

Table of Contents


						Number of Shares/Units
Non-vested at December 31, 2019						854,268
Granted						1,045,439
Vested						(258,212)
Forfeited						(695,284)
Non-vested at December 31, 2020						946,211
Granted						760,345
Vested						(375,858)
Forfeited						(65,401)
Adjustment for certified periods						111,172
Non-vested at December 31, 2021						1,376,469
Granted						88,458
Vested						(195,737)
Forfeited						(650,747)
Adjustment for certified periods						26,042
Non-vested at December 31, 2022						644,485


Note Regarding Forecasts and Forward-Looking Statements

We do not as a matter of course make public forecasts as to our total shares outstanding and utilization of various equity awards due to the unpredictability of the underlying assumptions and estimates. In particular, the forecasts set forth in this Proposal No. 5 includes embedded assumptions which are highly dependent on the public trading price of our Class A common stock and other factors, which we do not control and, as a result, we do not as a matter of practice provide forecasts. These forecasts reflect various assumptions regarding our future operations. The inclusion of the forecasts set forth above should not be regarded as an indication that these forecasts will be predictive of actual future outcomes, and the forecasts should not be relied upon as such.

Amended 2010 Plan Subject to Stockholder Approval

The Amended 2010 Plan will only become effective if it is approved by our stockholders at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If our stockholders do not approve this Proposal No. 5, the Amended 2010 Plan, the Share Increase will not become effective.

The Amended 2010 Plan Combines Compensation and Corporate Governance Best Practices

The Amended 2010 Plan includes provisions that are designed to protect our stockholders’ interests and reflect corporate governance best practices.

•Repricing Not Allowed. The Amended 2010 Plan prohibits reducing the exercise price of stock options and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), cancelling “underwater” stock options and SARs for cash or another stock award or any action that would be considered a repricing under the applicable securities exchange on which our Class A common stock is traded without prior stockholder approval in each case.

•Stockholder Approval Required for Additional Shares. The Amended 2010 Plan does not contain an annual “evergreen” provision. The Amended 2010 Plan authorizes a fixed number of shares, so that stockholder approval is required to issue any additional shares.

•No Liberal Share Counting or Recycling. If fewer shares are issued in settlement of a stock award than were covered by such stock award for reasons other than the failure to satisfy vesting conditions, or other than as a result of termination or forfeiture (for example to satisfy the exercise price or tax withholding obligation of such award), then the unissued shares will generally not become available again for issuance under the Amended 2010 Plan.

•No Liberal Corporate Transaction Provisions. No corporate transaction related vesting acceleration and other benefits may occur without an actual corporate transaction occurring.

Table of Contents

•No Discounted Stock Options or SARs. All stock options and SARs granted under the Amended 2010 Plan must have an exercise or strike price equal to or greater than the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date the stock option or SAR is granted.

•Minimum Vesting Requirement. Future awards granted under the Amended 2010 Plan will have a minimum one-year vesting period from the date of grant, subject to the aforementioned exceptions described above (and below).

•No Dividends and Dividend Equivalents on Unvested Awards. Dividends and dividend equivalents will not be paid or settled with respect to any stock award granted under the Amended 2010 Plan until the underlying shares or units vest, and no dividend equivalents or otherwise may be credited with respect to stock options and SARs.

•Limit on Non-Employee Director Awards. The Amended 2010 Plan provides that the maximum number of shares subject to stock awards granted during a calendar year under the Amended 2010 Plan, taken together with any cash fees paid during such calendar year for services as a non-employee director, will not exceed $750,000 in total value for any non-employee director.

•Awards Subject to Clawback. Stock awards granted after May 31, 2017 are subject to clawback pursuant to any clawback policy adopted by us from time to time or required by law; provided further, if a participant is terminated for cause, all of a participant’s outstanding awards granted after the 2023 Annual Meeting will terminate and the Board may require the participant to reimburse us for awards that have already settled as described above (and below).

Description of the Amended 2010 Plan

Set forth below is a summary of the other principal features of the Amended 2010 Plan. The Amended 2010 Plan is set forth in its entirety as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement, and all descriptions of the Amended 2010 Plan contained in this Proposal No. 5 are qualified by reference to Appendix A.

History of the Amended 2010 Plan. The 2010 Plan was originally adopted by our Board in June 2010, and it was approved by our stockholders in July 2010. As originally adopted, the 2010 Plan had 2,000,000 shares reserved for issuance. In addition, the number of shares available for issuance was increased on January 1 of each of 2010 through 2014 by the lesser of (i) 3% of the total number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock issued and outstanding on each December 31 or (ii) such number of shares determined by our Board (this provision is commonly referred to as an “evergreen provision”). The evergreen provision expired by its terms in 2014, accordingly, additional shares will no longer be automatically reserved for issuance through the evergreen. In May 2014, May 2017, and June 2020, our stockholders approved amendments to the 2010 Plan that, among other things, increased the shares reserved thereunder by 3,400,000 shares, 2,790,000 shares, and 4,250,000 shares, respectively.

Eligibility. Employees (including officers), consultants, independent contractors, advisors and members of the Board (including non-employee directors) are eligible to participate in the Amended 2010 Plan. As of April 3, 2023, there were approximately 1,123 employees (including 6 executive officers), 1 consultant and 8 non-employee directors eligible to receive awards under the Amended 2010 Plan. Since our executive officers and non-employee directors may participate in the Amended 2010 Plan, each of them has an interest in this proposal.

Types of Awards and Minimum Vesting. Awards that may be granted are stock options (both nonstatutory stock options and incentive stock options (which may only be granted to employees)), restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), SARs, performance-based awards and stock bonuses (each individually, an “award”). Ninety-five percent (95%) of awards granted under the Amended 2010 Plan must contain a minimum one-year vesting period; provided that, (i) awards assumed or substituted in connection with an acquisition and (ii) awards granted to non-employee directors that vest on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the date of grant or the next annual meeting of stockholders (which is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders) are not subject to this minimum vesting requirement.

Shares Reserved for Issuance. If this proposal is approved, the total number of shares available for future issuance will increase by 2,400,000 shares from 1,458,162 to 3,858,162 shares. This number reflects the requested increase and remaining shares available for future issuance as of April 3, 2023. The total number of authorized

Table of Contents

shares will increase from 16,970,471 to 19,370,471 shares, which amount does not take into account shares that are no longer available for future issuance.

Shares Returned to the Plan. Except as described in the next paragraph, shares subject to awards, and shares issued under any stock award granted under the Amended 2010 Plan will again be available for grant and issuance in connection with subsequent awards to the extent such shares: (a) are subject to issuance upon exercise of an option or SAR granted under the Amended 2010 Plan but which cease to be subject to the option or SAR right for any reason other than exercise of the award; (b) are subject to awards granted under the Amended 2010 Plan that are forfeited or repurchased by us at the original issue price; or (c) are subject to awards granted under the Amended 2010 Plan that otherwise terminate without such shares being issued. To the extent a stock award is paid out in cash rather than shares, such cash payment will not result in reducing the number of shares available for issuance under the Amended 2010 Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, any reference to awards granted under the “Amended 2010 Plan” in this paragraph includes such awards granted prior to amendment of the 2010 Plan.

Shares Not Returned to the Plan. Shares that are withheld to pay the exercise or purchase price of a stock award or to satisfy any tax withholding obligations in connection with an award, shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of an option exercise, and shares that are not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding option will not be available again for grant and issuance under the Amended 2010 Plan. In addition, the full number of shares subject to SARs granted under the Amended 2010 Plan that are to be settled by the issuance of shares shall be counted against the number of shares available for issuance under the Amended 2010 Plan, regardless of the number of shares actually issued upon settlement of such SAR.

Per Share Exercise Price. The per-share exercise price of stock options and SARs granted under the Amended 2010 Plan must equal at least the fair market value of a share of our Class A common stock on the grant date of the option.

No Repricing or Exchange Program Without Prior Stockholder Approval. Neither the exercise price of an option or SAR may be reduced (repriced) without prior stockholder approval nor can an exchange program be implemented without prior stockholder approval (other than in connection with certain corporate transactions, including stock splits, stock dividends, mergers, spin-offs and certain other similar transactions).

Number of Shares Per Calendar Year and Incentive Stock Option Limit. No person is eligible to receive more than 2,000,000 shares in any calendar year pursuant to the grant of awards under the Amended 2010 Plan, except that new employees are eligible to receive up to a maximum of 4,000,000 shares in the calendar year in which they commence employment. No more than 25,000,000 shares may be issued pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options.

Vesting and Exercisability. Awards become vested and exercisable, as applicable, within such periods, or upon such events, as determined by the administrator and as set forth in the related award agreement. Vesting may be based on the passage of time in connection with services performed for us or upon achievement of performance goals or other criteria, subject to the minimum one-year vesting requirement described above. The maximum term of each option and SAR is ten years from the date of grant. Options cease vesting on the date of termination of service or the death or disability of the service provider and generally expire three months after the termination of the service provider’s service to us or up to 12 months following the date of death or disability. SARs become exercisable as they vest and are settled in cash or shares, as determined by the administrator, having a value at the time of exercise equal to (1) the number of shares deemed exercised, times (2) the amount by which our stock price on the date of exercise exceeds the exercise price of SARs. RSUs are settled in cash or shares, depending on the terms upon which they are granted, and only to the extent that they are vested. Shares subject to a restricted stock award that are unvested remain subject to our right of repurchase. In addition, the Amended 2010 Plan allows us to reduce or extend the vesting of awards in the event a participant has a change in status from a full-time employee to a part-time employee or takes an extended leave of absence.

Method of Exercise. The exercise price of options and the purchase price, if any, of other stock awards may be paid by cash, check, broker assisted same-day sales or such other methods permitted by the Amended 2010 Plan, the administrator and applicable law, provided that no participant will be permitted to execute a promissory note as partial or full consideration for the purchase of Shares.

Adjustment of Shares. If the number of outstanding shares is changed by a stock dividend, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, subdivision, combination, reclassification or similar change in the capital structure of the company, without consideration, then (a) the number of shares reserved for issuance and future grant under the Amended 2010 Plan, (b) the exercise prices of and number of shares subject to outstanding stock options and SARs, (c) the number of shares subject to other outstanding awards, (d) the maximum number of shares that may be issued as incentive stock options and (e) the maximum number of shares that may be issued to an individual or

Table of Contents

to a new employee in any one calendar year, shall be proportionately adjusted, subject to any required action by our Board or our stockholders and in compliance with applicable securities laws.

Performance Awards. Our Compensation Committee may also make awards of performance shares or performance units (“PRSUs”) subject to the satisfaction of specified performance criteria.

Our Compensation Committee determines the terms surrounding performance awards, including the required levels of performance with respect to specified business criteria (including any adjustment(s) thereto that will be applied in determining the achievement of such performance criteria), the corresponding amounts payable upon achievement of such levels of performance, and the termination and forfeiture provisions; provided that all performance criteria must be determined when the achievement of such criteria remains substantially uncertain and the Compensation Committee must certify in writing the extent to which such performance criteria have been timely achieved and the extent to which the shares subject to awards have been earned.

As determined by the Compensation Committee, to the extent applicable, the performance criteria may be based on GAAP or non-GAAP results, and may be on an individual, divisional, business unit or Company-wide basis. The performance criteria may differ from participant to participant and from award to award and may include: net revenue and/or net revenue growth; earnings per share and/or earnings per share growth; earnings before income taxes and amortization and/or earnings before income taxes and amortization growth; operating income and/or operating income growth; net income and/or net income growth; total stockholder return and/or total stockholder return growth; return on equity; return on invested capital; return assets; cash flow; operating cash flow return on income; adjusted operating cash flow return on income; economic value added; control of expenses; cost of goods sold; profit margin; stock price; debt or debt-to-equity; gross dollar volume; active accounts; purchase volume; cash transfers; tax refunds; liquidity; intellectual property (e.g., patents)/product development; mergers and acquisitions or divestitures; individual business objectives; company specific operational metrics; and any other factor (such as individual business objectives or unit-specific operational metrics) the Compensation Committee so designates.

Stockholder Approval. Stockholder approval is required for certain types of amendments to the Amended 2010 Plan. Stockholder approval is required to increase the number of shares available for issuance.

Administration. Our Compensation Committee will administer the Amended 2010 Plan, except when the Board decides to directly administer the Amended 2010 Plan.

Non-Employee Director Equity Awards. Non-employee directors may be granted stock awards under the Amended 2010 Plan on a discretionary basis or pursuant to any policy adopted by our Board. The Amended 2010 Plan provides that the maximum number of shares of our Class A common stock subject to stock awards granted during a single calendar year under the Amended 2010 Plan, taken together with any cash fees paid during such calendar year for services as a non-employee director, will not exceed $750,000 in total value for any non-employee director. Such applicable limit will include the value of any stock awards that are received in lieu of all or a portion of any cash retainers or fees payable for services as a non-employee director under a policy adopted by the Board or otherwise.

No Dividends and Dividend Equivalents on Unvested Awards. Dividends and dividend equivalents will not be paid or settled with respect to any stock award granted under the Amended 2010 Plan until the underlying shares or units vest, and no dividend equivalents or otherwise may be credited with respect to Options and SARs.

Transferability. Unless determined otherwise by the Compensation Committee, a stock award granted under the Amended 2010 Plan may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution. If the Compensation Committee makes a stock award transferable, including, without limitation, by instrument to an inter vivos or testamentary trust in which the awards are to be passed to beneficiaries upon the death of the trustor (settlor) or by gift to a permitted transferee, such award will contain such additional terms and conditions as the administrator deems appropriate; provided, however, that in no event may any award be transferred for consideration to a third-party financial institution.

Corporate Transaction. In the event of a corporate transaction (as defined in the Amended 2010 Plan), the buyer may either assume outstanding awards or substitute equivalent awards. If the buyer fails to assume or substitute awards issued under the Amended 2010 Plan (including awards granted prior to amendment of the 2010 Plan), all awards will expire upon the closing of the transaction, and the Board will determine whether the corporate transaction will have any additional effect, including acceleration of the vesting of awards. Unless otherwise determined by our Board, all unvested stock option and RSU awards made to our non-employee directors accelerate and vest in full upon consummation of a corporate transaction.

Table of Contents

Comprehensive Clawback of Equity Awards. The Amended 2010 Plan provides that stock awards granted after the adoption of our "claw-back" policy will be subject to recoupment pursuant to that policy. In addition, with respect to awards granted after the 2023 Annual Meeting, if a participant’s employment is terminated for cause (as defined in the Amended 2010 Plan), all of the participant’s outstanding stock awards will terminate and the Compensation Committee may require such participant to reimburse us for all or a portion of any stock award that was settled in cash or shares after the event giving rise to cause first occurred.

Amendment or Termination of Amended 2010 Plan. Our Board may at any time terminate or amend the Amended 2010 Plan in any respect, including, without limitation, amendment of any form of stock award agreement or instrument to be executed pursuant to the Amended 2010 Plan; provided, however, that our Board will not, without the approval of our stockholders, amend the Amended 2010 Plan in a manner that requires approval by our stockholders.

Termination Date. The Amended 2010 Plan will terminate on April 27, 2030.

U.S. Federal Tax Aspects

A participant who receives an option or SAR will not have taxable income upon the grant of the option or SAR. For options (other than incentive stock options) and SARs, the participant will recognize ordinary income upon exercise in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares over the exercise price-the appreciation value-on the date of exercise. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares generally will be capital gain or loss.

Purchase of shares upon exercise of an incentive stock option will not result in any taxable income to the participant, except for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. Gain or loss recognized by the participant on a later sale or other disposition of the shares will be capital gain or loss and/or ordinary income depending upon whether the participant holds the shares transferred upon exercise for a specified period. If the shares are held for the specified period, any gain generally will be taxed at long-term capital-gain rates. If the shares are not held for the specified period, generally any gain up to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price will be treated as ordinary income. Any additional gain generally will be taxable at long-term or short-term capital-gain rates, depending on whether the participant held the shares for more than one (1) year after the exercise date.

A participant who receives restricted stock will not have taxable income upon grant, but upon vesting unless the participant elects to be taxed at the time of grant of restricted stock. The participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of vesting.

A participant who receives RSUs, PRSUs or performance shares will not have taxable income upon grant of the stock award; instead, the participant will be taxed upon settlement of the stock award. The participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares or the amount of cash received by the participant. In addition, Section 409A of the Code imposes certain restrictions on deferred compensation arrangements. Stock awards that are treated as deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code are intended to meet the requirements of this section of the Code.

At the discretion of the Compensation Committee, the Amended 2010 Plan allows a participant to satisfy tax withholding requirements under U.S. federal and state tax laws or applicable foreign tax laws by electing to have shares of Class A common stock withheld, by delivering to us already-owned shares, having a value equal to the amount required to be withheld, or by any other means which the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, determines both to provide legal consideration for the shares and to be consistent with the purposes of the Amended 2010 Plan. However, if shares of our Class A common stock are withheld to satisfy a participant’s tax withholding obligations with respect to a stock award, then the withheld shares will not become available again for issuance.

The Company will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with a stock award under the Amended 2010 Plan only in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by the participant and at the time the participant recognizes the income. The Company will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with a stock award under the Amended 2010 Plan only in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by the participant and at the time the participant recognizes the income. In addition, Section 162(m) of the Code places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct as a business expense in any year with respect to certain of our most highly paid executive officers. While the Compensation Committee considers the deductibility of compensation as one factor in determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to award and pay compensation that is not deductible as it believes that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to maintain

Table of Contents

flexibility in our approach to executive compensation and to structure a program that we consider to be the most effective in attracting, motivating and retaining key employees.

New Plan Benefits

The Amended 2010 Plan does not provide for set benefits or amounts of awards and we have not approved any awards that are conditioned on stockholder approval of the Amended 2010 Plan. However, as discussed in further detail in the section entitled “Director Compensation” above, each of our non-employee directors is entitled to an annual grant of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $125,000. In addition, each non-employee member of the Board of Directors who also serves on the board of directors of our subsidiary bank is entitled to an additional grant of RSUs having a fair market value on the grant date equal to $125,000. The following table summarizes the RSU grants that our current non-employee directors as a group will receive if they remain a director following the 2023 Annual Meeting and highlights the fact that none of our executive officers (including our named executive officers) or employees will receive any set benefits or awards that are conditioned upon shareholder approval of the Amended 2010 Plan. All other future awards to directors, executive officers, employees and consultants under the Amended 2010 Plan are discretionary and cannot be determined at this time.


Name and Position	Dollar Value	Number of Shares/Units
George Gresham President and Chief Executive Officer	—	—
Jess Unruh Chief Financial Officer	—	—
Teresa Watkins Chief Operations Officer	—	—
Chris Ruppel Chief Revenue Officer	—	—
Amit Parikh Executive Vice President of Banking Platform Services	—	—
Dan R. Henry Former President and Chief Executive Officer	—	—
All current executive officers as a group (6 persons)	—	—
All current directors who are not executive officers as a group (8 persons)(1)	$1,625,000	—
All employees, including all current officers who are not executive officers, as a group	—	—

____________

(1) Mr. Brewster, Mr. Fanlo, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Shaheen and Mr. Date are eligible to receive an annual grant of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $125,000 for their service on the Board and an additional grant of RSUs having a fair market value on the grant date equal to $125,000 for their service on the board of directors of our subsidiary bank. Mr. Feld, Ms. Richey, and Mr. Osher are eligible to receive an annual grant of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $125,000 for their service on the Board. The number of shares subject to each non-employee director’s RSU grant will not be determinable until the grant date. The number of shares subject to each non-employee director’s RSU grant will not be determinable until the grant date. See Proposal No. 1, Election of Directors - Director Compensation for more information.

Historical Plan Benefits

The following table sets forth, for each of the individuals and groups indicated, the total number of shares of our Class A common stock subject to stock awards that have been granted (even if not currently outstanding) under the 2010 Plan through April 3, 2023.


Name and Position (1)						Number of Shares/Units
George Gresham (2) President and Chief Executive Officer						846,648
Jess Unruh Chief Financial Officer						341,405
Teresa Watkins Chief Operations Officer						70,050
Chris Ruppel Chief Revenue Officer						160,568
Amit Parikh Executive Vice President, Banking Platform Services						170,904

Table of Contents


Dan R. Henry Former President and Chief Executive Officer						246,551
All current executive officers as a group (6 persons)						1,695,457
All current directors who are not executive officers as a group (8 persons) (3)						329,677
All employees, including all current officers who are not executive officers, as a group						21,623,927

____________

(1) No awards have been granted under the 2010 Plan to any associate of any of our directors (including nominees) or executive officers since its inception.

(2) Mr. Gresham received more than 3% of the total awards granted under the 2010 Plans since its inception.

(3) All the non-employee directors who are nominees for election as a director are included within this group. The total number of shares that they were granted on an individual basis are as follows: Mr. Brewster, 83,136; Mr. Date, 33,228; Mr. Fanlo, 39,140; Mr. Jacobs, 82,055; Mr. Osher, 11,511; Ms. Richey, 11,421; Mr. Feld, 4,220; and Mr. Shaheen, 64,966.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2022 with respect to the shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.


Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)	Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights ($) (b)(1)	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	945,774(2)(3)	$45.31	5,372,086(4)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	1,000,000(5)	$23.83	—
Total	1,945,774		5,372,086

(1) The weighted average exercise price relates solely to outstanding stock option shares since shares subject to RSUs have no exercise price.

(2) Excludes purchase rights accrued under our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

(3) Includes options to purchase 170,966 shares of our Class A common stock and restricted stock unit awards covering 328,329 shares of our Class A common stock and performance restricted stock unit awards covering 446,479 shares of our Class A common stock.

(4) Includes 3,770,418 shares available for future issuance under the 2010 Plan. Also includes 1,601,668 shares available for future issuance under the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, including shares subject to purchase during the current purchase period, which commenced on November 15, 2022 (the exact number of which will not be known until the purchase date on May 14, 2023).

(5) Consists of performance-based stock options granted outside of our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan pursuant to inducement awards, which have not been exercised or settled. All the performance and service conditions of the performance-based stock options and PRSUs have been satisfied.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL NO. 5

Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock as of April 3, 2023, by:

•each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of either class of our Class A common stock;

•each of our directors or director nominees;

•each of our NEOs; and

•all of current our directors and executive officers as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the individuals and entities named in the table below under “Directors and Named Executive Officers” and “5% Stockholders” is c/o Green Dot Corporation, 4675 Cornell Road, Suite 280, Cincinnati, Ohio 45241 and references to shares refer to our Class A common stock.

Percentage ownership of our Class A common stock is based on 51,994,067 shares of our Class A common stock outstanding on April 3, 2023. Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares that they beneficially own, subject to community property laws where applicable. Shares of our Class A common stock subject to options or RSUs that are currently exercisable or exercisable or will settle within 60 days of April 3, 2023 are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the options or RSUs for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.


	Class A	% of
Name of Beneficial Owner	Common Stock	Total Voting
	Shares	Power
Directors and Named Executive Officers

J. Chris Brewster (1)	78,136	*

Rajeev V. Date (2)	19,440	*
Saturnino Fanlo (3)	43,140	*
Peter Feld (17)	5,298,330	10.2	%
George Gresham (4)	14,117	*
Dan R. Henry (5)	1,167,317	2.2	%
William I Jacobs (6)	70,055	*
Jeffrey B. Osher (7)	361,511	*
Amit Parikh (8)	39,748	*
Ellen Richey (9)	11,421	*
Chris Ruppel (10)	25,332	*
George T. Shaheen (11)	64,966	*
Jess Unruh (12)	57,119	*
Teresa Watkins (13)	9,356	*
All current directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)(14)	6,115,184	11.8	%

5% Stockholders
BlackRock, Inc. (15)	6,692,032	12.9	%
Vanguard Group, Inc. (16)	5,675,180	10.9	%
Starboard Value LP and affiliated entities (17)	5,294,110	10.2	%
T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. (18)	2,934,157	5.6	%

_____________

* Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of our outstanding shares of Class A common stock.

(1)Represents 69,696 shares held by Mr. Brewster and 8,440 shares subject to RSUs that vest within 60 days of April 3, 2023.

(2)Represents 11,000 shares held by Mr. Date and 8,440 shares subject to RSUs that vest within 60 days of April 3, 2023.

(3)Represents 34,700 shares held by Mr. Fanlo and 8,440 shares subject to RSUs that vest within 60 days of April 3, 2023.

(4)Represents 14,117 shares held by Mr. Gresham.

Table of Contents

(5)Mr. Henry was terminated as Chief Executive Officer effective on October 14, 2022. Beneficial ownership information for Mr. Henry is based on information available to us as of October 14, 2022.

(6)Represents 61,615 shares held by Mr. Jacobs and 8,440 shares subject to RSUs that vest within 60 days of April 3, 2023.

(7)Represents (i) 94,375 shares held by Harvest Small Cap Partners, L.P. and (ii) 255,625 shares held by Harvest Small Cap Partners Master, Ltd. Mr. Osher is the founding partner of No Street GP LP (“No Street Capital”), an investment advisor to each of Harvest Small Cap Partners, L.P., Harvest Small Cap Partners Master, Ltd. and HSCP Strategic II, L.P. Also represents 7,291 shares held by Mr. Osher and 4,220 shares subject to RSUs that vest within 60 days of April 3, 2023.

(8)Represents 39,748 shares held by Mr. Parikh.

(9)Represents 7,201 shares held by Ms. Richey and 4,220 shares subject to RSUs that vest within 60 days of April 3, 2023.

(10)Represents 25,332 shares held by Mr. Ruppel.

(11)Represents 40,478 shares held by Mr. Shaheen, 16,048 shares subject to options held by Mr. Shaheen that are currently exercisable as of April 3, 2023 and 8,440 shares subject to RSUs that vest within 60 days of April 3, 2023.

(12)Represents 57,119 shares held by Mr. Unruh.

(13)Represents 7,856 shares held by Ms. Watkins and 1,500 shares subject to options held that are currently exercisable as of April 3, 2023.

(14)Includes 6,082,524 shares, 17,548 shares subject to options held that are currently exercisable as of April 3, 2023 and 54,860 shares subject to RSUs that vest within 60 days of April 3, 2023. Only includes share holdings of persons who were serving as executive officers and directors of Green Dot as of the date of this proxy statement.

(15)Based solely on the information set forth in a Schedule 13G filed by BlackRock Inc. on February 1, 2023. BlackRock Inc. reported that, as of December 31, 2022, it had sole voting power over 6,604,704 shares and sole dispositive power over 6,692,032 shares. The principal business address of BlackRock Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(16)Based solely on the information set forth in a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group on February 9, 2023. The Vanguard Group reported that, as of December 31, 2022, it had shared voting power over 50,906 shares, sole dispositive power over 5,579,837 shares and shared dispositive power over 95,343 shares. The principal business address of the Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

(17)Based solely on the information set forth in a Schedule 13D amendment filed by Starboard Value LP on March 15, 2022. Starboard Value LP reported that, as of March 15, 2022, it had sole voting and dispositive power over 5,294,110 shares. Starboard Value LP, as the investment manager of Starboard Value and Opportunity Master Fund Ltd (“Starboard V&O Fund”), Starboard Value and Opportunity C LP (“Starboard C LP”), Starboard Value and Opportunity Master Fund L LP (“Starboard L Master”), Starboard X Master Fund Ltd (“Starboard X Master”) and a certain account managed by Starboard Value LP (the “Starboard Value LP Account”) and as the manager of Starboard Value and Opportunity S LLC (“Starboard S LLC”), may be deemed the beneficial owner of the (i) 2,794,265 shares owned by Starboard V&O Fund, (ii) 521,304 shares owned by Starboard S LLC, (iii) 303,636 shares owned by Starboard C LP, (iv) 284,217 shares owned by Starboard L Master, (v) 506,298 shares owned by Starboard X Master and (vi) 884,390 shares held in the Starboard Value LP Account. Peter A. Feld, a member of our Board of Directors, is a Managing Member of Starboard Value LP and may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power over these shares with Jeffrey C. Smith, who is also a Managing Member of Starboard Value LP. The principal business address of Starboard Value LP is 777 Third Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, New York 10017. Mr. Feld also holds 4,220 shares subject to RSUs that vest within 60 days of April 3, 2023.

(18)Based solely on the information set forth in a Schedule 13G filed by T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. on February 14, 2023. T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. reported that, as of December 31, 2022, it had sole voting power over 1,069,314 shares and sole dispositive power over 2,934,157 shares. The principal business address of T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. is 101 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21201.

Table of Contents

OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The names of our executive officers, their ages as of April 14, 2023, and their positions are shown below.

Name

Age

Position

Jason Bibelheimer

Chief Human Resources Officer

George Gresham

President and Chief Executive Officer

Amy Pugh

General Counsel and Secretary

Chris Ruppel

Chief Revenue Officer

Jess Unruh

Chief Financial Officer

Teresa Watkins

Chief Operations Officer

For information regarding Mr. Gresham, please refer to Proposal No. 1, “Election of Directors,” on page 26 above.

Jason Bibelheimer has served as our Chief Human Resources Officer since September 2017. Prior to joining Green Dot, he served in a number of positions at Western Digital, a computer hardware and data storage company, from June 2007 to September 2017, most recently as Vice President, HR Operations from June 2010 to September 2017. Mr. Bibelheimer holds a B.S. in business management from Pepperdine University.

Amy Pugh has served as our general counsel since September 2022. Prior to joining us, Ms. Pugh served in multiple roles at Cross River Bank since December 2019, most recently as Associate General Counsel. Prior to that she served in various legal counsel roles at Ubiquity Global Services, Inc. from July 2015 to December 2019, most recently as Senior Vice President, Legal. Ms. Pugh received a B.A. in History from the University of Kentucky and a J.D. from the Salmon P. Chase College of Law at Northern Kentucky University.

Chris Ruppel has served as our Chief Revenue Officer since November 2022. Previously, he had served as our Head of Direct to Consumer from March 2022 to November 2022 and as General Manager of Wage and Corporate Disbursements from March 2017 to March 2022. Mr. Ruppel joined Green Dot in connection with our March 2017 acquisition of UniRush LLC, where he had served as that company’s President of rapid! PayCard since January 2015. He founded rapid! PayCard, a prepaid payroll debit card provider, and served as its Chief Executive Officer from January 2004 until March 2011, when it was acquired by WEX Inc. Following the acquisition of rapid! PayCard, he served in leadership positions at WEX, including most recently as General Manager of Prepaid Cards, The Americas, from March 2013 to January 2014. Mr. Ruppel received B.A. degrees in English and finance from Florida State University.

Jess Unruh has served as our Chief Financial Officer since November 2022. Previously, he had served as our Chief Accounting Officer since May 2015. From October 2016 to December 2019, he served as our Operational Chief Financial Officer and as our interim Chief Financial Officer from January 2020 until October 2021. Mr. Unruh served as our Vice President, Financial Reporting, from July 2013 to May 2015, and as Director, Accounting Projects, from July 2009 to June 2013. Prior to joining Green Dot, Mr. Unruh served in the audit practice at Ernst & Young LLP, an accounting firm, from 2003 to April 2009. Mr. Unruh holds B.S. degrees in accounting and business administration from the University of Southern California.

Teresa Watkins has served as our Chief Operations Officer since November 2022. Previously, she had served as our Senior Vice President of Payment Processing since August 2021. From September 2016 to August 2021, she served as our Vice President, Financial Processing Operations and, from December 2013 to September 2016, she served our Lead Technical Program Manager. Prior to joining us, Ms. Watkins served in multiple roles at JPMorgan Chase & Company over a more than eight-year period, including most recently as Senior Financial Operations Manager from October 2006 to December 2013. Ms. Watkins received a Master of Accounting and a B.S. in Accounting from University of South Florida.

On April 13, 2023, Amit Parikh, our Executive Vice President, Banking Platform Services, ceased serving as an executive officer of the Company. Following this change, Mr. Parikh continues to serve the Company in a full-time capacity as Executive Vice President, Banking Platform Services.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

A Message from the Chair of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

Dear Fellow Stockholders,

As we look forward to the 2023 Annual Meeting, this letter highlights our financial and operational accomplishments, the challenges we faced in the last year, key compensation decisions, and the changes that we made to our executive compensation program in response to the feedback that we received from our stockholders. Specifically, this letter and the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, or CD&A, that follows this letter highlight the following key themes:

•We have continued to transform our leadership team during a challenging and unprecedented time.

•We have followed through on our commitments to realign our compensation with best practices, which are consistent with the views expressed by our stockholders.

•Our compensation decisions and payouts are aligned with our financial and strategic performance.

We invite you to review the CD&A that follows this letter for more detailed information about our compensation initiatives.

Fiscal 2022 Overview

2022 yielded solid year-over-year financial results:

•Operating revenues increased 1% to $1.45 billion.

•Net income increased 35% to $64.2 million.

•Total operating expenses decreased 0.8% to $1.36 billion.

•Adjusted EBITDA increased 10% to $238.8 million.1

•GAAP diluted earnings per share increased 40% from $0.85 to $1.19 while non-GAAP diluted earnings per share increased 17% from $2.21 to $2.59.1

We finished the year ahead of our initial guidance due to a combination of solid revenue performance, diligence in managing costs and improvements in key operational areas such as fraud and customer care. We are working to build a modern and scalable core banking and card management platform that reduces our reliance on third-party processors and increases our ability to innovate and preserve margins. We completed our first platform conversion in the fourth quarter and the remaining platform conversions are expected to be completed in 2023. We had a significant customer engagement in our BaaS division in late 2022, along with continued new engagements in our Green Dot network and rapid! PayCard channels.

However, we continued to see a decline in our active accounts over 2022 due to the timing and magnitude of economic stimulus funds and incremental unemployment benefits provided under federal and state programs, as well as our strategic decision to reduce marketing spend on GO2bank, which had a corresponding impact on the amount of revenue we earned. Some BaaS partners chose to partner with other banks, which had a modest impact on our key metrics and financial results in 2022, and may have a negative impact in 2023.

Leadership Transformation

We continued the transformation of our executive team with the appointment of George Gresham as Chief Executive Officer and President in October 2022. Mr. Gresham succeeded Dan R. Henry, who was terminated from that role and resigned as a member of the Board. In November 2022, we appointed Jess Unruh as Chief Financial Officer, Teresa Watkins as Chief Operations Officer and Chris Ruppel as Chief Revenue Officer.

Key Fiscal 2022 Compensation Decisions

•No annual long-term incentive grants to our NEOs in 2022. Consistent with our prior commitments, we did not grant any annual equity awards, pursuant to our annual executive officer compensation program in 2022.

•New compensation packages approved in connection with promotions. In connection with their respective promotions, Mr. Gresham, Mr. Unruh and Ms. Watkins received an increase in their salary and target bonus, and Mr. Gresham also received an equity award.

•2022 short-term incentives paid out below target. We achieved 78% of our target EBITDA goal and the cash incentive awards of certain executive officers (including our Chief Executive Officer and EVP BaaS) were further reduced based on them not achieving 100% of their management business objectives (MBOs). Final payouts among the NEOs varied from 59% to 78% of target.

Table of Contents

•2021 long-term incentives grants were earned at slightly above target. In 2021, we granted PRSUs to our executive officers with a 2022 non-GAAP EPS goal, which applied to 50% of the PRSUs that were granted (the other 50% applied to a 2021 non-GAAP EPS goal). While the Company achieved a non-GAAP EPS of $2.59 for 2022, which would have resulted in 118% of the applicable target PRSUs being earned, the Committee elected to reduce the number of target PRSUs earned to 112% after considering the impact of stock repurchases and the Company’s overall performance.

Our Response to our 2022 Say on Pay Vote (related to 2021 compensation) and Commitment to Governance

In response to the 2022 say-on-pay vote, in which 99% of votes cast (for or against), voted in favor of our compensation program, we followed through with our commitments to our stockholders to realign our compensation with best practices, and made the following enhancements to our compensation program:

•We revised our 2022 short-term incentive plan to allow for the ability to reduce (but not increase) payouts based on individual achievement against key strategic objectives, subject to the achievement of corporate financial objectives, thereby creating greater individual accountability. As noted above, the impact of this design change was a reduction in bonus payouts to certain NEOs based on an assessment of their MBOs

•We revised our long-term equity incentive program to include a 3-year performance period and to incorporate 3-year relative total stockholder return, or TSR, and 3-year cumulative earnings per share goals, beginning with our 2023 PRSU grants.

Also consistent with our prior commitments, we did not make one-time equity award grants or pay discretionary bonuses to our executive officers, except in the context of new hires and promotions, and did not grant any annual equity awards, pursuant to our annual executive officer compensation program in 2022.

We thank our stockholders for taking the time to share their insights, whether in person or through written correspondence, and look forward to continuing this dialogue.

Sincerely,

George T. Shaheen

Chair, Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

1 See Appendix A for GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, or CD&A, is designed to provide our stockholders with an explanation of our executive compensation philosophy and objectives, our 2022 executive compensation program and the compensation paid by the Company to the following named executive officers in 2022, referred to throughout this proxy statement as our NEOs:


George Gresham, President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)1
Jess Unruh, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)2
Teresa Watkins, Chief Operations Officer (“COO”)2
Chris Ruppel, Chief Revenue Officer (“CRO”)2
Amit Parikh, Executive Vice President, Banking Platform Services
Dan R. Henry, Former President and Chief Executive Officer1

1 Mr. Gresham was promoted to CEO and Mr. Henry was terminated from this role, effective October 14, 2022.

2 Mr. Unruh, Ms. Watkins, and Mr. Ruppel were appointed CFO, COO and CRO, respectively, effective November 9, 2022.

Listening to Stockholders

At our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which took place in May 2022, we requested that stockholders cast a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs, also known as a "say-on-pay" vote. This proposal passed with approximately 99% of the votes cast (for or against) voted in favor of our compensation program. Following the 2022 say-on-pay vote, we followed through with the commitments that we made to our stockholders to realign our compensation with best practices, and made the following enhancements to our compensation program:

Also consistent with our prior commitments, we did not make one-time equity award grants or pay discretionary bonuses to our executive officers, except in the context of new hires and promotions, and did not grant any annual equity awards in 2022, pursuant to our annual executive officer compensation program.

Table of Contents

Compensation Governance Highlights


			What We Do:						What We Do Not Do:
			We reward performance that meets our predetermined goals						Pay excessive bonuses without justifiable performance linkage or proper disclosure
			A significant portion of our CEO and NEOs’ compensation is performance-based or at risk						Permit short-sales, hedging or pledging of our stock
			We have implemented robust stock ownership guidelines for our executives						Enter into employment agreements that provide for fixed terms or automatic compensation increases or equity grants
			We have adopted a "claw-back" policy that provides for the repayment of cash and/or equity compensation in the event of a restatement						Provide single-trigger change of control benefits
			We cap payouts under our plans to discourage inappropriate risk taking by our NEOs						Provide for excessive cash severance
			We have double-trigger change in control provisions for all change in control benefits						Provide our executives with tax gross-ups and perquisites
			The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant						Permit repricing or cashing out underwater stock options without stockholder approval
			We hold an annual advisory vote on executive compensation						Maintain any executive pension plans, or any retirement programs that are not generally available to all employees
			We seek feedback on executive compensation through stockholder engagement						Pay dividends and dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards unless and until awards vest

Our Compensation Philosophy and Objectives


Attract and retain Offer a total compensation program that flexibly adapts to changing economic, regulatory and organizational conditions, and takes into consideration the compensation practices of peer companies based on an objective set of criteria			Pay for performance Provide a significant portion of compensation through variable, performance-based components that is at-risk and based on satisfaction of designated financial and non-financial objectives
Align executive interests with our stockholders Compensate for achievement of short-term and long-term company financial and operating goals and refrain from providing special benefits, “golden parachute” excise tax gross-ups, or accelerated equity vesting except in limited circumstances			Reward actual achievement Align the interests of our executives with our stockholders by tying a significant portion of total compensation to our overall financial and operating performance and the creation of long-term stockholder value

Table of Contents

2022 Executive Compensation

The following charts provide a breakdown of the annual target total direct compensation of our current CEO and our other NEOs in 2022, who participated in our annual executive compensation program for 2022. 1 2

https://cdn.kscope.io/0876c7533adb8fb51cb657e2ce1584bf-CEO graph.jpg

https://cdn.kscope.io/0876c7533adb8fb51cb657e2ce1584bf-non CEO graph v2.jpg

1 Reflects 2022 salary rates, 2022 target incentive amounts and 50% of the target value of 2021 PRSUs and RSUs that were intended to cover both 2021 and 2022, and not amounts actually earned or paid out. Excludes promotional RSU award granted to Mr. Gresham on October 17, 2022. Amounts do not sum to 100% due to rounding.

2 Excludes Mr. Ruppel and Ms. Watkins, who joined us as executive officers in November 2022. Also excludes Mr. Henry, who terminated his employment with us in October 2022.

Elements of Compensation

The key components of our compensation program for our NEOs in 2022 are summarized in the table below. While we did not grant any PRSUs and RSUs, pursuant to our annual executive officer compensation program in 2022, we have included the PRSU and RSU grants made in 2021 as they were intended to cover awards for both 2021 and 2022. The Compensation Committee considers each compensation component individually and all compensation components in the aggregate when making decisions regarding amounts that may be awarded under each compensation component.

Compensation Element

Form of Compensation

Guaranteed vs. At-Risk

Performance vs. Time-based

Base Salary

Cash

Guaranteed

N/A

Annual Incentive

Cash

At-Risk

Performance-based

Annual Long-term Incentives

EPS PRSUs1

RSUs1

At-Risk

At-Risk

Performance-based

Time-based

Termination, Change in Control, and Retirement Benefits

Cash/Equity/Other

N/A

1 The Compensation Committee did not grant any PRSUs or RSUs in 2022 but in 2021, as part of the 2021 annual review cycle for executive officers, adopted a long-term equity incentive program, pursuant to which they granted PRSU and RSU awards to certain of our NEOs equal to two-times the standard annual target long-term equity award values, which were intended to cover awards for both 2021 and 2022.

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Decisions Related to Executive Team Changes

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with George Gresham

In October 2021, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with George Gresham, our CFO and COO, who succeeded Dan R. Henry as President and CEO of the Company following Mr. Henry’s termination. The employment agreement is substantially similar to his prior employment agreement, which he entered into on October 21, 2021, with the following adjustments to his compensation due to his promotion:

•an annual base salary of $800,000 ($650,000 previously);

•a promotional award of restricted stock units (the “Promotion RSUs”) with a grant date value of $2 million, vesting in three equal annual installments subject to his continued service; and

•a 2023 annual equity incentive award opportunity with a grant date value of $7 million.

Mr. Gresham’s target bonus remained unchanged at 125% of salary. Similar to his prior agreement, if Mr. Gresham’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Gresham for “good reason”, subject to his execution of a release of claims, he will be entitled to the following: (i) a prorated target bonus for the year of termination; (ii) a payment equal to one times (or, if such termination of employment occurs in connection with a corporate transaction, one and one-half times) the sum of his base salary plus target bonus opportunity; (iii) a payment equal to 12 months (or, if such termination occurs in connection with a corporate transaction, 24 months) of COBRA premiums; (iv) vesting of the portion of the Promotion RSUs that would have become vested by the end of the 12–month period after such termination, calculated as if such RSUs vested monthly (or, if such termination occurs in connection with a corporate transaction, full vesting of such RSUs); and (v) prorated vesting of the 2023 annual equity incentive award (or, if such termination occurs in connection with a corporate transaction, full vesting).

Compensation Packages for New Executive Officers

In November 2022, Jess Unruh, our Chief Accounting Officer succeeded Mr. Gresham as CFO, Teresa Watkins, our Senior Vice President of Payment Processing was promoted to COO, and Chris Ruppel, who served as head of our Consumer Services segment was promoted to CRO. In connection with their promotions, the Compensation Committee:

•approved an increase in Mr. Unruh’s annual base salary from $390,000 to $450,000, effective November 7, 2022;

•established Ms. Watkin’s annual base salary at $400,000, effective November 7, 2022, with a target annual incentive opportunity of 75% of annual base salary under the Company’s annual Executive Officer Incentive Bonus Plan; and

•established Mr. Ruppel’s annual base salary at $450,000, effective November 7, 2022, with a target annual incentive opportunity of 75% of annual base salary under the Company’s annual Executive Officer Incentive Bonus Plan.

Additionally, in connection with their promotions, the Compensation Committee approved the following target values for Mr. Unruh’s and Ms. Watkins’ respective total equity awards to be granted as part of the annual grant cycle for executive officers in 2023: $1,125,000 (Mr. Unruh) and $700,000 (Ms. Watkins) and $1,125,000 (Mr. Ruppel).

Rationale for Compensation Decisions Related to Promotions

In adjusting Mr. Gresham, Mr. Unruh, Ms. Watkins, and Mr. Ruppel’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considered, among other things:

•Their increased duties and responsibilities in their new roles;

•Peer data, the compensation of their predecessors (if applicable) and market competitiveness;

•With respect to equity grants, the desire to further align their interests with those of our stockholders;

•The desire to retain key talent; and

•The recommendations of our independent compensation consultant

Table of Contents

Analysis of Compensation Components

Base Salary


2022 BASE SALARY
Philosophy						Considerations
•Attract and retain. Provide fixed compensation to attract and retain key executives						•Salary reviewed and set annually •The factors used to determine base salaries included scope of responsibilities, individual and company performance (for current employees), retention, date of last increase (for current employees), internal equity, equity ownership, our 2022 peer group data and the recommendations of our CEO (other than with respect to his own compensation)

The following table summarizes the annual base salary rates of our NEOs in 2022, which reflects the salary adjustments made in connection with the promotions of Mr. Gresham, Mr. Unruh, Ms. Watkins, and Mr. Ruppel.


Name	2022 Base Salary	2021 Base Salary

George Gresham1	$800,000	$650,000
Jess Unruh1	$450,000	$390,000
Teresa Watkins2	$400,000	$280,000
Chris Ruppel3	$450,000	$300,000
Amit Parikh	$450,000	$450,000
Dan R. Henry	$800,000	$800,000

1 Mr. Gresham and Mr. Unruh’s compensation remained the same as 2021 until their promotions.

2 Ms. Watkins’ base salary was $325,000 prior to her promotion, which reflects certain increases that were made in connection with her performance and assuming a broader operations role before formally being appointed as COO.

3 Mr. Ruppel’s base salary was $350,000 prior to his promotion, which reflects an increase that was made in connection with a change in role and responsibilities from Senior Vice President, Wage and Disbursements to General Manager, Direct.

Table of Contents

2022 Annual Incentive Awards


2022 ANNUAL INCENTIVE AWARDS
Philosophy	Target Amount Considerations	Award Design Considerations	Performance Conditions

•Pay for Performance: Establish appropriate short-term performance conditions that the Compensation Committee believes will drive our future growth and profitability •Reward Achievement: Reward achievement of short-term performance conditions •Align interests with stockholders: Payout tied to company performance consistent with 2022 financial plan and strategic objectives •Attract and Retain Executives: Offer market competitive incentive opportunities	•Factors used to determine target amounts included: (i) role, the scope of responsibilities, individual and company performance (for current employees), current salary (for current employees), internal parity, and anticipated future contributions of the NEO; (ii) our 2022 peer group and broader survey data; and (iii) the recommendations of our CEO (other than with respect to his own compensation)	•Adjusted EBITDA was chosen as the primary goal because it is widely used by investors and analysts to measure our overall operating performance •MBOs were incorporated into the plan so that outcomes are both a function of corporate financial achievement and the executive officer’s individual contributions toward key strategic objectives	•Threshold adjusted EBITDA goal of $225 million (90% of target) for any amounts to be earned, target of $250 million, and maximum of $300 million (120% of target) •Adjusted EBITDA determined overall payout opportunity (0% to 200%) but MBOs impacted to what extent 25% of the target amount was earned •Opportunity to earn up to 200% of the target incentive amount for superior performance •Adjusted EBITDA was defined to be consistent with the definition used in our earnings releases

In early 2022, the Compensation Committee approved the 2022 Executive Officer Incentive Bonus Plan (the “2022 Incentive Plan”). 100% of each NEO’s 2022 target annual incentive opportunity was granted in the form of a cash incentive award (except in the case of Mr. Ruppel, who received a PRSU award), which was earned, based on the achievement of adjusted EBITDA goals for 2022. Further, for Mr. Gresham and Mr. Parikh, who served as executive officers at the time the 2022 Incentive Plan was approved, 25% of their annual incentive target opportunity was subject to management business objectives (“MBOs”), the achievement of which would reduce (but not increase) payouts based on individual achievement against key strategic objectives as set forth in the formula below.

https://cdn.kscope.io/0876c7533adb8fb51cb657e2ce1584bf-payout.jpg

Table of Contents

MBOs applicable to Mr. Gresham and Mr. Parikh’s were as follows:


MBOs	Purpose	George Gresham	Amit Parikh

Regulatory Initiatives	Regulatory Environment as Differentiator
Platform, Customer, and Fraud Reductions Initiatives	Create a Great Foundation		N/A
Organization Alignment Initiatives	Create Performance Focused Culture		N/A
Key Account, Business Development and Innovation Initiatives	Innovation, Market Opportunities, Partner Retention

For Mr. Unruh, Ms. Watkins and Mr. Ruppel, 100% of their annual incentive opportunity was earned based on the same financial objectives as set forth in the formula below.

https://cdn.kscope.io/0876c7533adb8fb51cb657e2ce1584bf-payout2.jpg

The applicable Adjusted EBITDA goals and corresponding financial performance multipliers, which applied to each NEO’s annual incentive opportunity, are set forth in the table below.


Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands)						Financial Performance Multiplier1
$225						50%
$238						75%
$250						100%
$263						125%
$275						150%
$288						175%
$300						200%

1 If actual results fell between two discrete multipliers, linear interpolation would have been used to determine the multiplier.

Annual incentive opportunities, as a percentage of salary, did not increase in 2022 for our NEOs other than Ms. Watkins whose target annual incentive opportunity was increased from 50% to 75% of her base salary. However, the amount of Mr. Gresham and Mr. Unruh’s target annual incentive opportunities increased due to the salary increases that they received in connection with their promotions. Further, in the first quarter of 2022, prior to becoming an executive officer, Mr. Ruppel elected to receive a PRSU award in lieu of a cash incentive award, which was an opportunity that was made available to non-executive officers, who received PRSU awards. This PRSU award was earned based on the same criteria as Mr. Unruh and Ms. Watkins’ target annual incentive opportunities and vested over a one-year period. The following table summarizes the target annual incentive opportunity for each NEO.

Table of Contents


Name	Target Annual Incentive Opportunity (% of Salary)	Target Bonus
George Gresham1	125%	$853,082
Jess Unruh1	75%	$299,158
Teresa Watkins1	75%	$237,086
Chris Ruppel2	75%	$262,500
Amit Parikh	75%	$337,500
Dan R. Henry	125%	$1,000,000

1 Mr. Gresham, Mr. Unruh and Ms. Watkins’ target annual incentive opportunity reflects each NEO’s salary increase, which became effective on the date of their promotion.

2 Mr. Ruppel received a PRSU award with a target number of shares equal to this amount.

Our actual 2022 adjusted EBITDA of $238.8 million resulted in an aggregate financial performance multiplier of 78%. After considering their individual performance against their MBOs, the Compensation Committee determined that the portion of Mr. Gresham and Mr. Parikh’s annual incentive target opportunity that was subject to the NEOs should be reduced by the amount set forth below. The Compensation Committee also elected to use its negative discretion to further reduce the total earned amount of Mr. Gresham and Mr. Parikh’s annual incentive award by an additional 10% after considering the recommendations of Mr. Gresham and the Company’s overall financial results.

The actual annual incentive awards earned by our NEOs under the 2022 Incentive Plan, which varied from 59% to 78% of target, are set forth below.


			Financial Component		MBO Component
Name	Target Incentive Opportunity	Financial Performance Multiplier	% of Target Incentive	Amount Earned	% of Target Incentive	MBO Funding	Adjustment	Additional Discretionary Adjustment	% of Target Incentive Earned After Adjustments	Annual Incentive Payout
George Gresham	$853,082	78%	75%	$499,053	25%	$166,351	-$96,484	-$56,892	60%	$512,029
Jess Unruh	$299,158	78%	100%	$233,343	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	78%	$233,343
Teresa Watkins	$237,086	78%	100%	$184,927	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	78%	$184,928
Chris Ruppel	$262,500	78%	100%	7,400 of 9,486 PRSUs	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	78%	7,400 of 9,486 PRSUs
Amit Parikh	$337,500	78%	75%	$197,438	25%	$65,813	-$40,804	-$22,245	59%	$200,202
Dan R. Henry1	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

1 Mr. Henry was entitled to a prorated annual incentive award of $786,301 for the year of termination based on target performance, pursuant to the severance provisions of his employment agreement.

Table of Contents

Equity Awards Previously Granted as Part of 2021 Annual Grant Cycle

In addition to new hire and promotional grants, in furtherance of our pay for performance philosophy and culture, we generally grant equity awards to our NEOs on an annual basis. In early 2021, as part of the annual compensation review cycle for executive officers and, in an effort to drive our executive team to achieve meaningful growth in non-GAAP EPS over the next two years, the Compensation Committee adopted a long-term equity incentive program, pursuant to which they made PRSU and RSU grants equal to two-times each executive officer’s standard annual target long-term equity award values (such PRSU grants, the “2021 PRSUs”), which were intended to cover awards for both 2021 and 2022. 75% of our current and former CEO’s target equity award value was in the form of PRSUs and 25% in the form of time-based RSUs. For our other NEOs (other than Mr. Gresham), 60% of their target equity award value was in the form of PRSUs and 40% in the form of time-based RSUs. The table describes the key feature of the 2021 PRSUs.


2021 PRSU GRANTS (Intended to cover 2021 and 2022 Annual Grants)
Philosophy	Grant Amount Considerations	Award Design Considerations	Performance Conditions/ Vesting Conditions

•Pay for Performance: Establish appropriate performance conditions that the Compensation Committee believes will drive our future growth and profitability •Reward Achievement: Provide meaningful and appropriate incentives for achieving company financial goals that the Compensation Committee believes are important for our short- and long-term success •Align Interests with Stockholders: Tie payout of stock awards to profitability •Attract and Retain Executives: Additional long-term vesting requirement once performance conditions are achieved to further encourage retention of our executives (for other NEOs)	•Factors used to determine the size of grants included: (i) role, scope of responsibilities, individual and company past performance (for current employees), current salary (for current employees), internal parity, and anticipated future contributions of the NEO; (ii) the competitiveness of the NEO's overall compensation package with reference to the 2021 peer group practices and broader survey information; (iii) the NEO's existing equity holdings; (iv) the extent to which these holdings are vested; (v) the recommendations of our CEO (other than with respect to his own compensation); and (vi) our “burn rate” relative to our industry burn rate guidelines, per certain stockholder and proxy advisor methodology	•Payout of NEOs’ awards should be based on the Company’s profitability and should also be used to promote retention past the performance period •Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share goals were also chosen because non-GAAP diluted earnings per share is widely used by investors and analysts to measure our overall operating performance and to align with our guidance at the time	•50% of the 2021 PRSUs vest based on (i) a 2021 non-GAAP EPS goal and (ii) the satisfaction of a multi-year service requirement, which runs until 2024 •50% of the 2021 PRSUs vest based on (i) a 2022 non-GAAP EPS goal and (ii) the satisfaction of a multi-year service requirement, which runs until 2025 •For each portion, achievement of the EPS goal could result in a payout ranging from 50% to 200%, subject to the achievement of the threshold non-GAAP EPS target

50% of the 2021 PRSUs vest based on (i) the achievement of a 2021 non-GAAP EPS goal and (ii) the satisfaction of a multi-year service requirement, which runs until 2024 (the “2021 EPS PRSUs”). The remaining 50% of the 2021 PRSUs vest based on (i) the achievement of a 2022 non-GAAP EPS goal and (ii) the satisfaction of a multi-year service requirement, which runs until 2025 (the “2022 EPS PRSUs”).

A threshold level of performance had to be achieved to earn the minimum number of shares under the 2021 EPS PRSUs and the 2022 EPS PRSUs. Performance below the threshold would result in no shares being earned. The 2021 EPS PRSUs and the 2022 EPS PRSUs vest as to 25% of the shares earned at the end of the performance period upon certification of the non-GAAP EPS achievement by the Compensation Committee with the remainder vesting in equal annual installments over the three years thereafter based on service. The Compensation Committee believed that this design provided the appropriate balance between performance and retention for long-term equity incentive awards. Consequently, the 2021 EPS PRSUs would be fully vested by December 2024 and the 2022 EPS PRSUs would be fully vested by December 2025, subject to the service requirements being satisfied.

Table of Contents

For purposes of these awards, non-GAAP EPS was calculated as set forth below:

Non-GAAP net income1

Non-GAAP diluted weighted-average shares

Non-GAAP EPS

1 Excludes the impact of employee stock-based compensation expense and related employer payroll taxes, amortization of acquired intangible assets, changes in fair value of contingent consideration, transaction and related acquisition costs, impairment charges, amortization of deferred financing costs, legal settlements, losses in equity method investments, changes in fair value of loans held for sale, realized gains on sales of investments, extraordinary severance expenses, and other income and expense that the Compensation Committee determines are not reflective of ongoing operating results.

As disclosed previously, actual non-GAAP EPS was $2.21 for 2021, which resulted in a “multiplier" of 114% for 2021. Accordingly, 114% of the target number of shares were earned with respect to the 2021 EPS PRSUs, with 75% of such shares subject to the additional three-year service requirement.

For the 2022 EPS PRSUs, the 2022 non-GAAP EPS goals were set in early 2021 at the same time the goals for the 2021 EPS PRSUs were set. We believe the 2022 non-GAAP EPS goals, summarized below, were set at challenging levels above the 2021 non-GAAP EPS goals, with the 2022 target goal (100% payout level) representing a 15% increase over the 2021 target goal (100% payout level).


2022 Non-GAAP EPS Goals						PRSU Payout Multiplier1
$2.14						50%
$2.31						75%
$2.47						100%
$2.63						125%
$2.79						150%
$2.96						175%
$3.13						200%

1 If non-GAAP diluted earnings per share falls between two discrete points in the chart above, linear interpolation is used to determine the payout multiplier.

While the Company achieved a non-GAAP EPS of $2.59 for 2022, which would have resulted in 118% of the applicable target PRSUs being earned, the Committee elected to reduce the number of target PRSUs earned to 112% after considering the impact of stock repurchases and the Company’s overall performance. The following table summarizes the target number of shares underlying the 2022 EPS PRSUs and the number of PRSUs earned:


2022 EPS PRSUs1
Name1	Target # Shares at Grant Date	Value at Grant Date	EPS Multiplier (Reflects Negative Discretion)	# Shares Earned	Value as of Certification Date (3/7/23)

George Gresham	51,428	$2,249,975	112%	57,600	$1,044,288
Jess Unruh	3,220	$161,741	112%	3,608	$65,413
Chris Ruppel	2,477	$124,420	112%	2,773	$50,274
Amit Parikh	22,137	$1,049,958	112%	24,793	$449,497
Dan R. Henry2	55,065	$2,765,915	N/A	0	0

1 Ms. Watkins was not granted any 2021 PRSUs.

2 Mr. Henry’s unvested 2021 PRSUs, which included the 2022 EPS PRSUs, were forfeited without any consideration on his termination date.

Table of Contents

No Equity Awards Were Granted as Part of the 2022 Executive Officer Annual Grant Cycle

Consistent with our prior commitments to stockholders, we did not grant any one-time equity awards or pay discretionary bonuses to our executive officers, except in the context of new hires and promotions, and did not grant any annual equity awards in 2022 as part of the 2022 annual grant cycle for executive officers. As discussed above, in 2022, Mr. Gresham received an RSU award in connection with his promotion to CEO. Further, prior to her appointment as an executive officer, in 2022, Ms. Watkins received an RSU award covering 4,319 shares as part of the 2022 annual grant cycle for senior leaders and an RSU award covering 8,077 shares, which was made in connection with her assuming a broader operations role prior to being formally appointed as COO. In addition, prior to his appointment as an executive officer, Mr. Ruppel was granted an RSU award covering 18,070 shares in connection with his promotion from Senior Vice President, Wage and Disbursements to General Manager, Direct.

Termination and Change of Control Benefits

The following table provides information regarding the separation agreements that we have with certain of our NEOs and our Corporate Transaction Policy, which applies to the equity awards of all our employees:


Termination and Change of Control Protections
Philosophy	Considerations	Terms

•Attract and Retain Executives: ◦Intended to facilitate a smooth transition of leadership due to an unexpected employment termination, or retirement ◦Attract, retain and encourage our NEOs to remain focused on our business and the interests of our stockholders when considering strategic alternatives •Align Interests with Stockholders: Mitigate any potential employer liability and avoid future disputes or litigation	• The employment of our NEOs is “at will,” meaning we can terminate them at any time, and they can terminate their employment with us at any time • Arrangements should be designed to: (i) provide reasonable compensation to executive officers who leave the Company under certain circumstances to facilitate their transition to new employment and (ii) require a departing executive officer to sign a separation and release agreement acceptable to us as a condition to receiving post-employment compensation payments or benefits • “Double-trigger” provisions preserve morale and productivity, and encourage executive retention in the event of a change of control • These provisions are considered a typical component of a competitive executive compensation program for executives among our 2021 peer group	Agreements with Certain NEOs: •Provide for certain cash payments, and/or the vesting of certain equity awards and COBRA benefits, in the event there is a separation of employment under various circumstances, subject to the execution of a release of claims Corporate Transaction Policy (Double-Trigger): •Provide for accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change of control if the recipient is terminated by the acquiring entity in connection with the change of control under specified circumstances, subject to the execution of a release of claims PRSUs: •Provide that upon a change of control any unearned PRSUs for which performance has not been determined will convert to time-based RSUs covering the target number of shares and such RSUs will continue to vest based on achievement of the existing service requirements

Separation Agreement with Dan R. Henry

In November 2022, in connection with his termination by the Company, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Henry, which provides for the same severance benefits that are provided for under his employment agreement, in consideration for a release of claims against us.

For additional information about Mr. Henry’s severance benefits and the severance and change of control arrangements of our NEOs, please refer to the section of this proxy statement titled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Table of Contents

Retirement Policy for Equity Awards

The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy applicable to all employees that provides for vesting of equity awards in connection with a qualifying retirement as summarized in the table below.


Retirement Policy
Philosophy	Considerations	Terms

•Attract and Retain Executives. Attract, retain and encourage our employees, including executives, to remain focused on our business for the long term	•Preserve morale and productivity and encourage long-term retention of employee base as a whole •Retirement vesting is consistent with competitive market practice •Performance awards should only pay out based on actual performance	•Provide for vesting of equity awards in connection with a qualifying retirement, with the settlement or payout of those awards to be made in accordance with the applicable vesting schedule of such awards •A qualifying retirement under the policy requires: (i) attaining the age of 55, (ii) being continuously employed by us for at least 10 years prior to the date of the qualifying retirement, (iii) not being terminable by us for cause (as defined in the policy), and (iv) not competing with us (as defined in the policy) •Any outstanding and unvested performance-based equity awards will remain outstanding until the Compensation Committee determines whether and to the extent the performance criteria is achieved, and will become 100% vested to the extent the Compensation Committee determines such awards are earned

Other Executive Benefits and Perquisites

In 2022, we did not provide perquisites to our executives that are not generally unavailable to other employees. During 2022, we provided the following benefits to our NEOs on the same basis as our other eligible employees:

•employee stock purchase plan;

•health insurance;

•flexible paid time-off;

•life insurance and supplemental life insurance;

•short-term and long-term disability insurance; and

•a 401(k) retirement plan.

We believe these benefits are generally consistent with those offered by other companies and specifically with those companies with which we compete for employees.

Table of Contents

Key Compensation and Governance Policies


Policy	Considerations	Material Features

Stock Ownership Guidelines	•Promote stock ownership in the Company •More closely align the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders	•5x base salary for CEO •2x base salary for all other NEOs •5 years from executive officer designation to comply •Includes shares owned outright, full value equity awards, and shares held by the executive officer’s spouse, dependent children and/or trust •As of April 3, 2023, all NEOs have either satisfied their ownership requirement or have additional time to satisfy such requirement
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies	•Hedging is viewed as a poor practice as it insulates executives from stock price movement and reduces alignment with stockholders •Pledging raises potential risks to stockholder value, particularly if the pledge is significant	•No employee, officer or director may acquire, sell or trade in any interest or position relating to the future price of the Company's securities, such as a put option, a call option or a short sale •Covered persons are prohibited from holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan
Equity Award Grant Policy	•Prohibit the granting of equity awards to take advantage of the release of material nonpublic information	•Equity award grants are not timed to take advantage of the release of material nonpublic information
Claw-back Policy	•Allows us to recoup cash incentive and equity awards in the event of a restatement that was caused by fraud or intentional misconduct •We intend to timely amend and restate our clawback policy to reflect the new SEC and NYSE requirements.	•Applies to all executive officers and certain other employees •Applies to all awards granted under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and the Executive Officer Incentive Bonus Plan

Tax Considerations

While Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct as a business expense in any year with respect to certain of our most highly paid executive officers, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to award compensation that is not deductible as it believes that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to maintain flexibility in our approach to executive compensation in order to structure a program that we consider to be the most effective in attracting, motivating and retaining key executives.

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Process

General Approach

The Compensation Committee considers a variety of factors when setting and evaluating executive officer pay levels, including: role, tenure, experience, scope of responsibilities, institutional knowledge, retention risk, marketability, replacement cost, leadership skills, job and company performance (past and present), internal parity, regulatory considerations, stockholder feedback, and the recommendations of our CEO (other than with respect to his own compensation). In addition, the Compensation Committee utilizes competitive market data as a reference point and not as a determinative factor for structuring and determining the amount of compensation to be awarded to our executive officers.

From time to time, special business conditions may warrant additional compensation, such as sign-on bonuses, or equity awards in connection with promotions or in recognition of significant accomplishments or in light of retention concerns or internal equity issues. In these situations, we consider our business needs and the potential costs and benefits of special rewards.


Compensation Committee Decision Process The Compensation Committee oversees the compensation of our NEOs and our executive compensation programs and initiatives. The Compensation Committee typically reviews executive officer compensation, including base salary, short-term incentives and long-term incentives, in the first quarter of each fiscal year, to understand competitive market compensation levels and practices based on the most recently completed year. In connection with this review, the Compensation Committee considers any input it may receive from our CEO in evaluating the performance of each executive officer and sets each executive officer's target total direct compensation for the current year based on this review and the other factors described above.

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee generally retains an independent compensation consultant to help understand competitive compensation levels and incentive designs. The independent compensation consultant is hired by, and reports directly to, the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate the independent compensation consultant. At the Compensation Committee's discretion, the independent compensation consultant:

•attends Compensation Committee meetings;

•assists the Compensation Committee in determining peer companies and evaluating compensation proposals;

•assists with the design of incentive compensation programs; and

•conducts compensation-related research.

In making 2022 compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee retained Mercer to help select an appropriate peer group for executive compensation benchmarking purposes, review our executive compensation programs, assist the Compensation Committee in designing our executive compensation program, and provide the Compensation Committee with information regarding executive compensation trends.

Table of Contents

Fiscal 2022 Peer Group

Based on input from management and Mercer, the Compensation Committee did not elect to adjust our primary peer group for 2022, except to remove Cardtronics plc, which had been acquired. For 2022, the primary peer group used to inform our Compensation Committee of pay decisions and practices consisted of:

2022 Peer Group

ACI Worldwide, Inc.

Enova International, Inc.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Blucora, Inc.

Euronet Worldwide, Inc.

Q2 Holdings, Inc.

Blackbaud, Inc.

Fair Isaac Corporation

WEX Inc.

Black Knight, Inc.

FirstCash, Inc.

World Acceptance Corporation

CSG Systems International

Guidewire Software, Inc.

These companies were chosen based on (i) market competition, and included companies that compete with us for customers, executive talent, and investors, (ii) organization size, with financial characteristics such as revenues that are similar to those of Green Dot, and (iii) industry, including companies in the payment processing and information technology industries.

In August 2021 when the fiscal 2022 peer group was approved, Green Dot ranked at the 59th percentile of peers based on revenues, the 79th percentile of peers based on total assets, and the 31st percentile of peers based on market cap.

Based on input from management and Mercer, the Compensation Committee did not elect to adjust our primary peer group for 2023.

Compensation Risk Assessment

The Compensation Committee has assessed our compensation philosophy and objectives, and forms of compensation and benefits for all employees, including executives, and has concluded that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.

The Compensation Committee believes that the design and objectives of our executive compensation program provide an appropriate balance of incentives for our NEOs, thereby discouraging them from taking inappropriate risks. Among other things, our executive compensation program includes the following design features:

•A balanced mix of cash and equity; as well as appropriately balanced fixed (base salary) and variable compensation (cash incentives and equity-based awards)

•A mix of short-term and long-term incentives, with long-term incentives representing a significantly greater proportion of the total mix

•Cash and equity incentives solely based on achieving company performance objectives and subject to our “claw-back” right under certain circumstances

•Caps on annual cash incentive and PRSU payouts

•Stock ownership guidelines, which align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders

•General alignment with prevalent low-risk pay practices

•Policies prohibiting hedging and pledging by our employees, officers or directors

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Report

The information contained in the following report of Green Dot's Compensation Committee is not considered to be “soliciting material,” “filed” or incorporated by reference in any past or future filing by Green Dot under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933 unless and only to the extent that Green Dot specifically incorporates it by reference.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) contained in this proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement and incorporated into Green Dot's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee

George T. Shaheen, Chair

Saturnino Fanlo

Peter Feld (Joined in 2023)

William I Jacobs

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

In 2022, the members of our Compensation Committee were George T. Shaheen (Chair), Saturnino Fanlo and William I Jacobs. None of the members of our Compensation Committee in 2022 were at any time during 2022 or at any other time an officer or employee of Green Dot or any of its subsidiaries and none had or have any relationships with Green Dot that are required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. None of Green Dot's executive officers have served as a member of the Board of Directors, or as a member of the compensation or similar committee, of any entity that has one or more executive officers, who served on our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee during 2022.

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

The following table shows compensation awarded to or earned by each of our NEOs for each of the last three or fewer fiscal years during which such individuals were determined to be NEOs.

Summary Compensation Table


Name and Principal Position(1)	Fiscal Year	Salary ($)(2)	Bonus ($)(3)	Stock Awards ($)(4)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	All Other Compensation ($)(5)	Total ($)
George Gresham	2022	679,423	—	1,999,987	—	512,029	6,993	3,198,432
President and Chief Executive Officer	2021	117,500	160,274	11,168,938	—	—	—	11,446,712
Jess Unruh	2022	397,846	—	—	—	233,343	7,625	638,814
Chief Financial Officer	2021	390,000	274,950	539,269	—	—	7,250	1,211,469
	2020	480,000	50,000	1,368,051	—	146,250	7,125	2,051,426
Teresa Watkins	2022	306,462	—	348,041		184,928	5,131	844,562
Chief Operations Officer
Chris Ruppel	2022	352,501	—	764,403	—	—	7,060	1,123,964
Chief Revenue Officer
Amit Parikh	2022	450,000	—	—	—	200,202	7,625	657,827
Executive Vice President, Banking Platform Services	2021	363,462	259,885	5,950,384	—	—	17,250	6,590,981
Dan R. Henry	2022	646,154	—	—	—	—	2,618,330	3,264,484
Former President and Chief Executive Officer	2021	800,000	800,000	12,427,594	—	—	4,294	14,031,888
	2020	650,750	—	3,999,961	10,380,001	770,492	5,653	15,806,857

_____________

(1)In October 2022, Mr. Gresham was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer. In November 2022, Mr. Unruh was appointed Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Watkins was appointed Chief Operations Officer, and Mr. Ruppel was appointed Chief Revenue Officer. Mr. Henry’s employment with us terminated in October 2022.

(2)The amounts in this column represent salaries earned during the fiscal year.

(3)The amounts in this column represent the annual incentive awards earned by our NEOs under the 2022 Incentive Plan. For additional detail regarding these awards, see “2022 Annual Incentive Awards” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.

(4)The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of awards of PRSUs and RSUs granted during the applicable period, as discussed in Note 13 of our notes to consolidated financial statements contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Mr. Gresham, Ms. Watkins, and Mr. Ruppel received time-based RSUs, the grant date fair value of which was based on the fair value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant.

Mr. Ruppel elected to receive a PRSU award in lieu of a cash incentive award prior to becoming an executive officer, which was earned based on the same criteria pursuant to the 2022 Executive Officer Incentive Bonus Plan (the “2022 Incentive Plan”). This PRSU award vested over a one-year period in one installment based upon the adjusted EBITDA achievement of the applicable 2022 targets. The grant date fair value of this award was based on the fair value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant and assumes target performance based on the likelihood the performance metrics would be achieved at the time of grant.

The table below sets forth the grant date fair value for the PRSUs awarded to Mr. Ruppel based upon (i) the probable outcome of the performance-related component as of the grant date, and (ii) achieving the maximum level of performance under the performance-related component as of the grant date. Other than Mr. Ruppel, none of our NEOs received a PRSU award in 2022.

Name

Fiscal Year

Probable Outcome of Performance Conditions Grant Date Fair Value ($)

Maximum Outcome of Performance Conditions Grant Date Fair Value ($)

Grant Date

Grant Date Fair Value ($)

Chris Ruppel

2022

263,142

526,283

3/25/2022

263,142

(5) The amounts in this column reflect company contributions to the NEO's 401(k) plan. The amount for Mr. Henry reflects the following: (i) $4,468 in company contributions to the 401(k) plan, and (ii) $2,613,862 in severance benefits in connection with the termination of his employment on October 14, 2022, which paid pursuant to the severance provisions of his employment agreement.

Table of Contents

The following table provides information regarding potential cash incentives paid or payable for the year ended December 31, 2022 under our performance-based, non-equity incentive plan, and each stock-based award granted to an NEO during 2022.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards - 2022


									All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)	Exercise Price of Option Awards ($)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(2)
	Grant Date	Approval Date	Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards ($)(1)			Estimated Possible Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (#)
Name			Threshold	Target	Maximum	Threshold	Target	Maximum
George Gresham	N/A	N/A	426,541	853,082	1,706,164	—	—	—	—	—	—
	10/17/2022(3)	10/17/2022	—	—	—	—	—	—	103,680	—	1,999,987
Jess Unruh	N/A	N/A	149,579	299,158	598,315	—	—	—	—	—	—
Teresa Watkins	N/A	N/A	118,543	237,086	474,173	—	—	—	—	—	—
	2/8/2022(3)	2/8/2022	—	—	—	—	—	—	4,319	—	133,112
	7/22/2022(3)	7/22/2022	—	—	—	—	—	—	8,077	—	214,929
Chris Ruppel	3/25/2022(4)	3/25/2022	—	—	—	4,743	9,486	18,972		—	263,142
	3/25/2022(3)	3/25/2022	—	—	—	—	—	—	18,070	—	501,262
Amit Parikh	N/A	N/A	168,750	337,500	675,001	—	—	—	—	—	—
Dan R. Henry	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

_____________

(1)Represents possible cash incentive awards to be earned under our 2022 Incentive Plan. 100% of each NEO’s 2022 target annual incentive opportunity was granted in the form of a cash incentive award (or if elected by the NEO, a PRSU award), which was earned based on the achievement of adjusted EBITDA goals for 2022, with a threshold adjusted EBITDA goal of $225 million (90% of target) and a target adjusted EBITDA goal of $250 million. The actual payout of the annual incentive awards could range from 50% to 200% of the target annual incentive amount, assuming the achievement of threshold goal. Further, for Mr. Gresham and Mr. Parikh, who served as executive officers at the time the 2022 Incentive Plan was approved, 25% of their target annual incentive amounts were subject to management business objectives, the achievement of which would reduce (but not increase) their payouts based on individual achievement against key strategic objectives. Cash incentives earned for 2022 performance are reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table above. For additional detail regarding the terms of this award, see “2022 Annual Incentive Awards” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.

(2)The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of awards of PRSUs and RSUs. See Footnote 3 to the Summary Compensation Table for more information.

(3)Represents a time-based RSU award, which will vest and settle in equal annual installments on each of the three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

(4)Mr. Ruppel elected to receive a PRSU award in lieu of a cash incentive award prior to becoming an executive officer, which was earned based on the same criteria pursuant to the 2022 Incentive Plan. He received a PRSU award with a target number of shares of 9,486, which was equal to the amount of his target bonus. This PRSU award vested over a one-year period in one installment, subject to continued service through the vesting date.

Table of Contents

The following table provides information regarding each unexercised stock option or unvested stock awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2022.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End


		Option Awards				Stock Awards
		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(1)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Name	Grant Date	Exercisable	Unexercisable
George Gresham	10/21/2021(2)	—	—	—	—	—	—	300,000	4,746,000
	10/21/2021(3)	—	—	—	—	57,600	911,232	—	—
	10/21/2021(4)	—	—	—	—	11,429	180,807	—	—
	10/17/2022(4)	—	—	—	—	103,680	1,640,218	—	—
Jess Unruh	1/13/2020(4)	—	—	—	—	12,611	199,506	—	—
	3/11/2020(5)	—	—	—	—	1,929	30,517	—	—
	3/11/2020(6)	—	—	—	—	2,009	31,782	—	—
	1/29/2021(7)	—	—	—	—	1,834	29,014	—	—
	1/29/2021(3)	—	—	—	—	3,608	57,079	—	—
	1/29/2021(8)	—	—	—	—	3,581	56,651	—	—
Teresa Watkins	3/11/2020(6)	—	—	—	—	1,507	23,841	—	—
	4/2/2021(4)	—	—	—	—	1,419	22,449	—	—
	9/9/2021(4)	—	—	—	—	1,306	20,661	—	—
	2/8/2022(4)	—	—	—	—	4,319	68,327	—	—
	7/22/2022(4)	—	—	—	—	8,077	127,778	—	—
Chris Ruppel	1/13/2020(4)	—	—	—	—	2,993	47,349	—	—
	3/11/2020(5)	—	—	—	—	3,216	50,877	—	—
	3/11/2020(6)	—	—	—	—	3,349	52,981	—	—
	1/29/2021(7)	—	—	—	—	1,413	22,354	—	—
	1/29/2021(3)	—	—	—	—	2,773	43,869	—	—
	1/29/2021(8)	—	—	—	—	2,754	43,569	—	—
	3/25/2022(9)	—	—	—	—	7,400	117,069	—	—
	3/25/2022(4)	—	—	—	—	18,070	285,867	—	—
Amit Parikh	3/8/2021(10)	—	—	—	—	—	—	21,083	333,533
	3/8/2021(3)	—	—	—	—	24,793	392,225	—	—
	3/8/2021(7)	—	—	—	—	12,618	199,617	—	—
	3/8/2021(8)	—	—	—	—	24,597	389,125	—	—
	3/8/2021(11)	—	—	—	—	28,112	444,732	—	—
Dan R. Henry	3/25/2020(12)	1,000,000	—	23.83	3/25/2027	—	—	—	—

____________

(1)Represents the unvested portion of PRSU awards that have completed their respective performance periods and the unvested portion of RSU awards. The market values of the PRSUs and RSUs are calculated by multiplying the number of shares underlying the units shown in the table by $15.82, the closing price of our shares of Class A common stock on December 31, 2022, the last trading day of 2022.

(2)Represents a PRSU award, which vests once the performance and service-based requirements are met. The PRSU shall satisfy the performance-vesting requirement to the extent that the company’s closing stock price over any 20 consecutive trading day period occurring prior to the third anniversary of Mr. Gresham’s employment effective date is equal to or exceeds the applicable Stock Price Hurdle, during which the applicable Stock Price Hurdle of each such tranche is achieved as follows: 1/3rd shall be achieved at $65 stock price hurdle; 1/3rd shall be achieved at $75 stock price hurdle and 1/3rd shall be achieved at $95 stock price hurdle. The service-based vesting shall become vested as follows: (i) the first one-third of each tranche of the PRSU shall become service-vested upon the first anniversary of Mr. Gresham’s employment effective date and (ii) the remaining two-thirds of each Tranche of the PRSU shall become service-vested in 24 equal installments at the end of each calendar month occurring after such first anniversary.

Table of Contents

(3)Represents the unvested portion of a PRSU award, which was earned based upon achievement of 2022 non-GAAP diluted EPS targets. 25% of the shares vested on March 7, 2023 upon certification of the non-GAAP EPS goals under the 2022 PRSUs by the Compensation Committee, with the remainder vesting in three equal annual installments on each December 15 thereafter.

(4)Represents the unvested portion of a RSU award, which vests in equal annual installments on each of the three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

(5)Represents the unvested portion of a PRSU award, which was earned based on our performance through the end of the one-year performance period (2020). 25% of the shares vested on February 10, 2021 upon certification of the non-GAAP EPS goals under the 2020 PRSUs by the Compensation Committee, with the remainder vesting in three equal annual installments on each December 15 thereafter.

(6)Represents the unvested portion of a RSU award, which vests in equal annual installments on each of the four anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

(7)Represents the unvested portion of a PRSU award, which was earned based on our performance through the end of the one-year performance period (2021). 25% of the shares vested on February 8, 2022 upon certification of the non-GAAP EPS goals under the 2021 PRSUs by the Compensation Committee, with the remainder vesting in three equal annual installments on each December 15 thereafter.

(8)Represents the unvested portion of a RSU award consisting of two tranches, each of which has a separate vesting schedule: (A) 50% of the award vests over three years with one-third vesting on each one-year anniversary of the grant date, subject to the NEO’s service through each vesting date; and (B) the remaining 50% of the awards vests over four years with one-third vesting on the second anniversary of the grant date and the remainder vesting on each one-year anniversary thereafter, subject to the NEO’s service through each vesting date.

(9)Mr. Ruppel elected to receive a PRSU award in lieu of a cash incentive award prior to becoming an executive officer, which was earned based on the same criteria pursuant to the 2022 Incentive Plan. He received a PRSU award with a target number of shares of 9,486, which was equal to the amount of his target bonus. This PRSU award vested over a one-year period in one installment, subject to continued service through the vesting date.

(10)Represents a PRSU award, which will vest based on the achievement of a stock price hurdle and an Adjusted EBITDA target. Upon determination of the achievement of both performance results, 25% of the PRSUs would immediately vest, and 6.25% of the remaining PRSUs would vest and settle following the end of each fiscal quarter for 12 consecutive fiscal quarters. As of the date of this proxy statement, none of the PRSUs have vested as none of the performance metrics have been achieved.

(11)Represents the unvested portion of a RSU award, which vests as follows: (i) 1/6th of the RSUs vested upon Mr. Parikh’s completion of six months of continuous service after his hire date, (ii) 1/6th of the RSUs vested after vested upon Mr. Parikh’s completion of 12 months of continuous service after his hire date, and (iii) the remainder of the RSUs vests in equal annual increments after he completes each additional 12 month period of continuous service thereafter, so that the RSUs are fully vested on the third anniversary of his hire date.

(12)Represents inducement performance-based stock options (“PSOs”), which were earned, based on the achievement of certain stock price milestones before the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. The performance requirements for the PSOs have all been satisfied. One-third of the shares subject to the PSOs vested on March 25, 2021, with the remainder vesting in 24 equal installments at the end of each calendar month thereafter. On October 14, 2022, in connection with his termination, the remainder of Mr. Henry’s unvested PSOs vested. Mr. Henry’s PSOs remain exercisable for 24 months following his termination date.

Table of Contents

The following table provides information concerning the vesting of stock awards for certain of our NEOs during fiscal year 2022. None of our NEOs exercised options in 2022.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested - 2022


	Option Awards		Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)	Value Realized on Exercise ($)	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)	Value Realized on Vesting ($)
George Gresham	—	—	5,713	102,663
Jess Unruh	—	—	18,770	578,865
Teresa Watkins	—	—	2,293	55,545
Chris Ruppel	—	—	10,417	263,457
Amit Parikh	—	—	24,565	593,387
Dan R. Henry	—	—	143,286	3,283,188

Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

Separation Arrangements

All of our current NEOs are employed at will and may be terminated at any time, with or without formal cause.

George Gresham. On October 16, 2022, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Gresham in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer and President that provides for certain severance benefits upon a qualifying termination.

If Mr. Gresham’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Gresham for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in his amended and restated employment agreement), subject to his execution of a release of claims, he will be entitled to the following:

(i) a prorated target bonus for the year of termination;

(ii) a payment equal to one times (or, if such termination of employment occurs during the period 60 days prior to and two years following a “corporate transaction” (as defined in the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan), one and one-half times) the sum of his base salary plus target bonus opportunity;

(iii) a payment equal to 12 months (or, if such termination occurs in connection with a corporate transaction, 24 months) of COBRA premiums;

(iv) vesting of the portion of the RSUs granted to Mr. Gresham on October 17, 2022 that would have become vested by the end of the 12–month period after such termination, calculated as if such RSUs vested monthly over the remaining vesting period commencing from the last regularly scheduled vesting date prior to the termination date (or, if such termination occurs in connection with a corporate transaction, full vesting of such RSUs); and

(v) prorated vesting of 2023 time-based RSU awards (or, if such termination occurs in connection with a corporate transaction, full vesting).

Moreover, Mr. Gresham’s amended and restated employment agreement provides that the following equity award benefits shall continue to apply with respect to the inducement PRSU and RSU awards that were granted to him on October 21, 2021: (A) acceleration of the service vesting of then outstanding inducement PRSUs (if any) that otherwise would have become service-vested over the 12 months following the termination date, with any such inducement PRSUs continuing to be eligible to become vested subject to achievement of any applicable stock price hurdles prior to the first anniversary of such termination date, (B) subject to any then outstanding inducement PRSUs becoming vested based on achievement of the 2022 EPS target, acceleration of the service vesting of such inducement PRSUs that otherwise would have become service-vested over the 12 months following the termination date (calculated as if such inducement PRSUs vest on a monthly basis), and (C) acceleration of the service vesting of then outstanding inducement RSUs (if any) that otherwise would have become service-vested over the 12 months following the termination date (calculated as if such inducement RSUs vest on a monthly basis). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if such termination of employment occurs in connection with a corporate transaction: (y) on the corporate transaction, if the performance target applicable to the inducement PRSUs has not yet been achieved, such inducement PRSUs shall become vested based on the greater of target or actual performance (as the same shall be determined as of immediately prior to the corporate transaction), and (z) on the later of the termination date or the

Table of Contents

corporate transaction, the service-vesting of any then outstanding inducement PRSUs and RSUs shall be fully and immediately accelerated.

Mr. Gresham’s amended and restated employment agreement also provides that if the compensation and benefits payable to him are subject to Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code, such payments will be reduced to the extent necessary to provide him the greatest after-tax benefit.

The following table summarizes the approximate value of the benefits that would be received in connection with the qualifying termination of Mr. Gresham, had he been terminated on December 31, 2022, the last business day of 2022. The value of the accelerated vesting benefits below is based upon the closing price per share of our Class A common stock of $15.82 on December 31, 2022.


George Gresham	Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason	Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason in Connection with Corporate Transaction (4)
Base Salary Plus Target Bonus	$1,653,082	$2,479,623
Prorated Target Bonus	$853,082	$853,082
COBRA Premiums (1)	$30,000	$60,000
Acceleration Value of 2022 RSUs (2)	$637,862	$1,640,218
Acceleration Value of 2021 Inducement PRSUs and RSUs (2)	$546,003 (3)	$5,838,039
Total	$3,720,029	$10,870,946

(1) Reflects estimated amounts of 12 and 24 months of COBRA premiums, respectively. The COBRA premium reimbursement cost is estimated at $2,500 per month.

(2) Amounts reflect the number of shares subject to unvested RSU award granted on October 17, 2022, and inducement PRSU and RSU awards granted on October 21, 2021.

(3) For purposes of determining the value of Mr. Gresham’s PRSU award that vests based on stock price hurdles, we have assumed no change in the closing price per share of our Class A common stock during the 12-month period following the hypothetical termination date of December 31, 2022, which was $15.82. Based on such assumption, the value of such award was $0 as of December 31, 2022.

(4) In this column, we have assumed that (i) the termination of employment occurred during the period 60 days prior to and two years following a corporate transaction; and (ii) all the stock price conditions were satisfied for Mr. Gresham’s Stock Price PRSUs.

Dan R. Henry. In connection with his termination of employment with the Company on October 14, 2022, Mr. Henry received the payments and benefits payable upon a termination without cause pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions of his employment agreement, dated as of March 24, 2020. Following his execution of a release of claims on October 14, 2022, Mr. Henry received the following: (i) a base salary and target bonus in the amount of $1,800,000, which were paid in a lump sum; (ii) a prorated target bonus for 2022 in the amount of $786,301, which was paid in a lump sum; (iii) COBRA premium payments for 12 months in the amount of $27,561, which was paid in a lump sum; (iv) with respect to PSOs granted as inducement awards on March 25, 2020, 166,666 unvested PSOs fully vested (which is equal to the number of such PSOs that otherwise would have vested over the 12 months following the termination date) and the vested PSOs will remain exercisable for 24 months following the termination date; (v) with respect to RSUs granted as the inducement awards on March 25, 2020, 13,988 unvested RSUs fully vested (which is equal to the number of such RSUs that otherwise would have vested over the 12 months following the termination date based on vesting in equal monthly installments); and (vi) with respect to PRSUs granted as inducement awards on March 25, 2020, 70,499 unvested PRSUs will vest (which is equal to the number of such PRSUs that otherwise would have vested over the 12 months following the termination date based on vesting in equal monthly installments).

The following table summarizes the actual value of the payments and benefits received by Mr. Henry in connection with the termination of his employment. The value of the accelerated vesting benefits below is based upon the closing price per share of our Class A common stock of $19.52 on October 14, 2022, the date of Mr. Henry’s termination of employment and execution of a release of claims.

Table of Contents


Dan R. Henry						Termination Without Cause (1)
Base Salary Plus Target Bonus						$1,800,000
Prorated Target Bonus						$786,301
COBRA Premiums						$27,561
Acceleration Value of Inducement Awards						$1,649,186
Total						$4,263,048

(1) The acceleration value of Mr. Henry’s PSOs was $0 as the exercise price of such PSOs was $23.83 per share, which exceeded our stock price on the date of his termination of $19.52.

Other NEOs. Mr. Unruh, Ms. Watkins, Mr. Ruppel, and Mr. Parikh are currently not entitled to any contractual severance payments or benefits upon the terms of their termination of service.

Change in Control Arrangements

Under the amended and restated employment agreement for Mr. Gresham, upon a termination of his employment without “cause” or his resignation for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the amended and restated employment agreement) that occurs 60 days prior to or within two years after a “corporate transaction” (as defined in the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan), he is entitled to additional severance benefits than what receives if his qualifying termination were not in connection with such a corporation transaction. These benefits are described and valued above in “Separation Arrangements.”

In addition, under our Corporate Transaction Policy, all of our employees, including our executive officers, are entitled to 100% acceleration of vesting of all of their outstanding and unvested equity awards in the event of the employee’s termination without “cause” or resignation for “good reason” (as each are defined in the policy) on or during the 12 months following a “corporate transaction” (as defined in the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan) (i.e. double-trigger acceleration), subject to the execution and non-revocation of a release of claims in our favor. For purposes of the Corporate Transaction Policy, any outstanding and unvested performance-based equity awards shall have their vesting accelerate at “target.” With respect to equity awards that do not contain a “target” level of achievement with respect to their applicable performance metrics, then such awards shall have their vesting accelerate in full with respect to any outstanding shares still subject to such award.

The benefits of the Corporate Transaction Policy are non-cumulative with the provisions of the equity awards and other written agreements with us. For purposes of the policy, any outstanding and unvested performance-based equity awards will accelerate at target or if no target is specified, any outstanding shares still subject to the award will accelerate. The Corporate Transaction Policy does not provide for any “golden parachute” tax gross-up.

The following table summarizes the acceleration value under the Corporate Transaction Policy of the outstanding equity awards held by each NEO, assuming a qualifying termination in connection with a corporate transaction on December 31, 2022, the last business and trading day of 2022. Values are based upon the closing price for a share of our Class A common stock of $15.82 on December 31, 2022, and the target number of shares subject to each NEO’s outstanding and unvested PRSUs.


Name						Accelerated RSU/PRSU Vesting (1)
George Gresham (2)						—
Jess Unruh						$398,410
Teresa Watkins						$263,055
Chris Ruppel						$692,252
Amit Parikh						$1,717,214
Dan R. Henry (3)						—

(1) Amount reflects the number of shares that would be issued at the target payout levels (100% of target) for the performance-based equity awards granted.

(2) The vesting of Mr. Gresham’s inducement award RSUs, PRSUs and Stock Price PRSUs accelerate as set forth in his amended and restated employment agreement, as described above.

(3) The acceleration value of Mr. Henry’s inducement award RSUs and PRSUs upon termination of his employment is described above.

Table of Contents

Retirement Policy

Our Retirement Policy for Equity Awards, which applies to all employees, provides for vesting of PRSU and RSU awards in connection with a qualifying retirement, with the settlement or payout of those awards to be made in accordance with the applicable vesting schedule pertaining to such awards. A qualifying retirement under the policy includes an employee that: (i) has attained the age of 55, (ii) has been continuously employed by us for at least 10 years prior to the date of the qualifying retirement, (iii) is not terminable by us for cause (as defined in the policy), and (iv) is not competing (as defined in the policy) with us. For purposes of the policy, any outstanding and unvested performance-based PRSU awards will remain outstanding until our Compensation Committee determines in the normal course (as if no qualifying retirement occurred) whether and to the extent, the performance criteria is achieved, and will become 100% vested to the extent our Compensation Committee determines such awards are earned, and, in general, with the settlement our payout of those awards to be made in accordance with the applicable vesting schedule pertaining to such awards. As of December 31, 2022, no NEOs are retirement eligible.

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

Our estimated CEO to median employee pay ratio for 2022 is 29:1 and was calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. As disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above, the annual total compensation for 2022 for George Gresham, our current President and CEO, who was appointed prior to the "employee population determination date" (as defined below), was $3,198,433. The annual total compensation for our median employee for 2022 was $108,585.

In calculating the CEO pay ratio, the SEC rules allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, apply certain exclusions, and make reasonable estimates and assumptions reflecting their unique employee populations and compensation practices. Therefore, our reported CEO pay ratio may not be comparable to CEO pay ratios reported by other companies due to differences in industries, geographical dispersion and employment and compensation practices, as well as the different estimates, assumptions, and methodologies applied by other companies in calculating their CEO pay ratios.

Calculation Methodology

For 2022, we identified the employee with annual total compensation at the median of the compensation of all our employees (the “median employee”) by considering our employee population as of December 31, 2022 (the “employee population determination date”). We considered all individuals, excluding our CEO, who were employed by us (including our consolidated subsidiaries) on the employee population determination date, whether employed in the United States or outside of the United States, or on a full-time, part-time, seasonal or temporary basis, including employees on a leave of absence. Contractors and other non-employees were not included in our employee population. As of December 31, 2022, our employee population consisted of 1,228 employees.

Compensation for purposes of identifying the median employee included the following: (1) base salary paid between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 (annualized for permanent employees who joined after January 1, 2022), (2) actual cash incentive compensation paid between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022, and (3) the grant date fair value of equity awards granted between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022, calculated using the same methodology we use for our NEOs in our Summary Compensation Table, which reflects all new hire and annual equity awards granted in 2022 to our employees who were employed as of the employee population determination date. For employees paid other than in U.S. dollars, we converted their compensation to U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect as of December 31, 2022, as provided in our system of record for compensation information. We did not make any cost-of-living adjustments for employees outside of the United States. We believe our methodology represents a consistently applied compensation measure because it strikes a balance in terms of administrative burden while consistently treating all the primary compensation components for our worldwide workforce and capturing a full year of each of such primary compensation components.

After identifying the median employee based on the methodology above, we calculated the annual total compensation for such median employee using the same methodology we use to calculate the amount reported for our NEOs in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Table of Contents

Pay Versus Performance

The following table sets forth information concerning: (1) the compensation of our President and Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Gresham), our former President and Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Henry), our former Interim Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Jacobs), and the average compensation for our other NEOs, both as reported in the Summary Compensation Table and with certain adjustments to reflect the “compensation actually paid” to such individuals, as defined under SEC rules, for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022 and (2) and our cumulative total shareholder return (“TSR”), the cumulative TSR of our comparator group (“S&P Composite 1500 Financials (Sector) TSR”), Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA over such years in accordance with SEC rules for each such fiscal year:


(a)	(b)	(b)	(b)	(c)	(c)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)
									Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on:
Year	Summary Compensation Table Total for Mr. Gresham	Summary Compensation Table Total for Mr. Henry ($)(1)	Summary Compensation Table Total for Mr. Jacobs ($)(1)	Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. Gresham ($)(1)(2)	Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. Henry ($)(1)(2)	Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. Jacobs ($)(1)(2)	Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs ($)(1)	Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-CEO NEOs ($)(1)(2)	Total Shareholder Return ($)(3)	S&P Composite 1500 Financials (Sector) Total Shareholder Return ($)(3)	Net Income (millions)	Adjusted EBITDA (millions)(4)
2022	3,198,433	3,264,484	—	(4,853,214)	(10,186,082)	—	816,292	(159,039)	67.90	118.59	64.2	238.7
2021	—	14,031,888	—	—	(5,692,483)	—	5,147,763	2,401,464	155.54	131.98	47.5	217.0
2020	—	15,806,857	2,218,967	—	51,313,985	2,143,464	4,959,171	5,354,598	239.48	98.09	23.1	205.8

____________

(1) The following individuals are our other NEOs for each fiscal year:

Year

CEOs

Non-CEO NEOs

2022

George Gresham and Dan R. Henry

Jess Unruh, Teresa Watkins, Chris Ruppel, and Amit Parikh

2021

Dan R. Henry

George Gresham, Jess Unruh, Amit Parikh, Brandon Thompson, and Jason Bibelheimer

2020

Dan R. Henry and William I Jacobs

Jess Unruh, Jason Bibelheimer Kristina Lockwood, Daniel Eckert, and Kuan Archer

(2) Compensation actually paid to our NEOs represents the “Total” compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable fiscal year, adjusted as follows:

Table of Contents


	2020			2021		2022
Adjustments	Mr. Henry $	Mr. Jacobs $	Average non-CEO NEOs $	Mr. Henry $	Average non-CEO NEOs $	Mr. Henry $	Mr. Gresham $	Average non-CEO NEOs $
Deduction for Amounts Reported under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” Columns in the Summary Compensation Table for Applicable FY	(14,379,962)	(1,561,217)	(4,023,043)	(12,427,594)	(4,527,438)	—	(1,999,987)	(278,111)
Increase based on ASC 718 Fair Value of Awards Granted during Applicable FY that Remain Unvested as of Applicable FY End, determined as of Applicable FY End	49,887,090	350,201	1,927,834	8,101,457	3,477,530	—	1,640,218	150,507
Increase based on ASC 718 Fair Value of Awards Granted during Applicable FY that Vested during Applicable FY, determined as of Vesting Date	—	1,050,285	2,374,200	1,262,930	72,800	—	—	—
Increase/deduction for Awards Granted during Prior FY that were Outstanding and Unvested as of Applicable FY End, determined based on change in ASC 718 Fair Value from Prior FY End to Applicable FY End	—	—	170,426	(9,957,908)	(1,629,710)	—	(7,587,501)	(716,000)
Increase/deduction for Awards Granted during Prior FY that Vested During Applicable FY, determined based on change in ASC 718 Fair Value from Prior FY End to Vesting Date	—	85,229	320,424	(6,703,255)	(139,482)	(6,914,657)	(104,377)	(131,727)
Deduction of ASC 718 Fair Value of Awards Granted during Prior FY that were Forfeited during Applicable FY, determined as of Prior FY End	—	—	(374,414)	—	—	(6,535,909)	—	—
Increase based on Dividends or Other Earnings Paid during Applicable FY prior to Vesting Date	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS	35,507,128	(75,503)	395,427	(19,724,371)	(2,746,300)	(13,450,566)	(8,051,647)	(975,330)

(3) TSR is cumulative for the measurement periods beginning on December 31, 2019 and ending on December 31 of each of 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, calculated in accordance with Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K. The S&P Composite 1500 Financials (Sector) is the industry specific index we use in our Form 10-K.

(4) “Adjusted EBITDA” is a definition of non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA that is widely used by investors to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to items, such as non-operating net interest income and expense, income tax benefit and expense, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation and related employer payroll taxes, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration, transaction costs, impairment charges, severance costs related to extraordinary personnel reductions, certain legal settlement charges, earnings or losses from equity method investments, realized gains or losses on the sale of investment securities, gain or losses on loans held for sale, and other charges and income that can vary substantially from company to company depending upon their respective financing structures and accounting policies, the book values of their assets, their capital structures and the methods by which their assets were acquired. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement includes a reconciliation of such non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Relationship between Financial Performance Measures

The line graphs below compare (i) the compensation actually paid to our CEO(s) and the average of the compensation actually paid to our remaining NEOs, with (ii) our cumulative TSR, (iii) S&P Composite 1500 Financials (Sector) TSR, (iv) our Net Income, and (v) our Adjusted EBITDA, in each case, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022.

TSR amounts reported in the graph assume an initial fixed investment of $100, and that all dividends, if any, were reinvested.

Table of Contents

https://cdn.kscope.io/0876c7533adb8fb51cb657e2ce1584bf-Compensation Paid vs TSR.jpg

https://cdn.kscope.io/0876c7533adb8fb51cb657e2ce1584bf-Compensation Paid vs NI.jpg

Table of Contents

https://cdn.kscope.io/0876c7533adb8fb51cb657e2ce1584bf-Compensaton Paid vs AdjEbitda.jpg

The following performance measures represent the most important financial performance measures used by us to link compensation actually paid to our NEOs to performance for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022:

•Adjusted EBITDA;

•Non-GAAP EPS; and

•Relative Total Shareholder Return.

Table of Contents

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES, FOUNDERS AND CONTROL PERSONS

From January 1, 2022 to the present, there have been no transactions, and there are currently no proposed transactions, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 to which we or any of our subsidiaries was (or is to be) a participant and in which any director, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any immediate family member of or person sharing the household with any of these individuals, had (or will have) a direct or indirect material interest, other than as described below and except for payments set forth under “Executive Compensation” or Proposal No. 1, “Election of Directors - Director Compensation” above.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Parties

We have adopted a written related-party transactions policy which sets forth our policies and procedures regarding the identification, review, consideration and approval or ratification of “related person transactions.” Our Audit Committee reviews transactions that may be “related person transactions,” which are transactions between us and any related persons in which the aggregate amount involved exceeds or may be expected to exceed $120,000, and in which the related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. For purposes of the policy, a related person is any executive officer, director, nominee for director or stockholder of ours holding more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, in each case since the beginning of the previous fiscal year, and their immediate family members.

Under the policy, absent any facts or circumstances indicating special or unusual benefits to the related person, the following transactions, arrangements or relationships need not be approved by our Audit Committee pursuant to the policy:

•employment by us of an executive officer if:

◦the related compensation is required to be reported in our proxy statement, or

◦the executive officer is not an immediate family member of another of our executive officers or directors, the related compensation would be reported in our proxy statement if the executive officer were a “named executive officer,” and our Compensation Committee approved or recommended that our Board approve the compensation;

•any compensation paid to a director if the compensation is required to be reported in our proxy statement;

•any transaction where the related person’s interest arises solely from the ownership of our Class A common stock and all holders of our Class A common stock received the same benefit on a pro-rata basis;

•any transaction where the rates or charges involved are determined by competitive bids;

•any transaction involving the rendering of services as a common or contract carrier, or public utility, at rates or charges fixed in conformity with law or government authority;

•any transaction involving services as a bank depository of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture or similar services;

•any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by us to a charitable organization, foundation or university at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than as an executive officer);

•any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by us to a charitable organization, foundation or university at which a related person is a trustee, director or executive officer, if the aggregate amount involved in any fiscal year does not exceed $120,000;

•any non-discretionary matching contribution, grant or endowment made pursuant to a matching gift program;

•ordinary course business travel expenses, advances and reimbursements; and

•any indemnification payments made pursuant to our insurance policies, certificate of incorporation or bylaws or as otherwise approved by our Board.

Under the policy, members of our legal department review transactions involving related persons that do not fall into one of the above categories. If they determine that a related person could have a significant interest in a transaction, the transaction is referred to our Audit Committee. In addition, transactions may be identified through our code of business conduct and ethics or our other policies and procedures and reported to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee determines whether the related person has a material interest in a transaction and may approve, ratify, reject, rescind or take other action with respect to the transaction.

Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The information contained in the following report of Green Dot's Audit Committee is not considered to be “soliciting material,” “filed” or incorporated by reference in any past or future filing by Green Dot under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933 unless and only to the extent that Green Dot specifically incorporates it by reference.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with Green Dot’s management and Ernst & Young LLP the audited consolidated financial statements of Green Dot contained in Green Dot’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. The Audit Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by applicable auditing standards.

The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from Green Dot.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in Green Dot’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Submitted by the Audit Committee

J. Chris Brewster, Chair

Rajeev V. Date*

Jeffrey Osher

Saturnino Fanlo

George T. Shaheen

* Rajeev V. Date was a member of the Audit Committee during all of 2022.

Table of Contents

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Stockholder Proposals to be Presented at Next Annual Meeting

Green Dot’s bylaws provide that, for stockholder nominations to the Board or other proposals to be considered at an annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholder must give timely notice in writing to the Corporate Secretary at Green Dot Corporation, 4675 Cornell Road, Suite 280, Cincinnati, Ohio 45241, Attn: Corporate Secretary.

To be timely for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received by our Corporate Secretary at the principal executive offices of Green Dot not earlier than 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time on February 10, 2024 and not later than 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time on March 11, 2024. A stockholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must set forth as to each matter the stockholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting the information required by Green Dot’s bylaws. In addition, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the company’s nominees must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b).

Stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and intended to be presented at Green Dot’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by us no later than December 16, 2023 in order to be considered for inclusion in Green Dot’s proxy materials for that meeting.

For nominees submitted for inclusion in our proxy materials pursuant to the proxy access provisions of our Bylaws, the nomination notice and other materials required by these provisions must be delivered or mailed to and received by our Corporate Secretary in writing at the address listed above between November 16, 2023 and December 16, 2023 (or, if the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is called for a date that is not within 30 calendar days of the anniversary of the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, by the later of the close of business on the date that is 180 days prior to the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or within 10 calendar days after our public announcement of the date of the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders). When submitting nominees for inclusion in our proxy materials pursuant to the proxy access provisions of our Bylaws, stockholders must follow the notice procedures and provide the information required by our Bylaws.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16 of the Exchange Act requires Green Dot’s directors, executive officers and any persons who own more than 10% of Green Dot’s Class A common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms furnished to Green Dot and written representations from the directors and executive officers, Green Dot believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements were timely met in fiscal year 2022, with the exception of the following filings:

Name

Transaction

Date Filed

J. Chris Brewster